Ng P C, So K W, Fung K S, Lee C H, Fok T F, Wong E, Wong W, Cheung K L, Cheng A F
Department of Paediatrics, Prince of Wales Hospital, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, NT.
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2001 May;84(3):F177-82. doi: 10.1136/fn.84.3.f177.
To evaluate the effectiveness of oral erythromycin as a prokinetic agent for the treatment of moderately severe gastrointestinal dysmotility in preterm very low birthweight infants.
A prospective, double blind, randomised, placebo controlled study in a tertiary referral centre of a university teaching hospital was conducted on 56 preterm infants (< 1500 g) consecutively admitted to the neonatal unit. The infants were randomly allocated by minimisation to receive oral erythromycin (12.5 mg/kg, every six hours for 14 days) or an equivalent volume of placebo solution (normal saline) if they received less than half the total daily fluid intake or less than 75 ml/kg/day of milk feeds by the enteral route on day 14 of life. The times taken to establish half, three quarters, and full enteral feeding after the drug treatment were compared between the two groups. Potential adverse effects of oral erythromycin and complications associated with parenteral nutrition were assessed as secondary outcomes.
Twenty seven and 29 infants received oral erythromycin and placebo solution respectively. The times taken to establish half, three quarters, and full enteral feeding after the drug treatment were significantly shorter in the group receiving oral erythromycin than in those receiving the placebo (p < 0.05, p < 0.05 and p < 0.0001 respectively). There was also a trend suggesting that more infants with prolonged feed intolerance developed cholestatic jaundice in the placebo than in the oral erythromycin group (10 v 5 infants). None of the infants receiving oral erythromycin developed cardiac dysrhythmia, pyloric stenosis, or septicaemia caused by multiresistant organisms.
Oral erythromycin is effective in facilitating enteral feeding in preterm very low birthweight infants with moderately severe gastrointestinal dysmotility. Treated infants can achieve full enteral feeding 10 days earlier, and this may result in a substantial saving on hyperalimentation. However, until the safety of erythromycin has been confirmed in preterm infants, this treatment modality should remain experimental. Prophylactic or routine use of this medication for treatment of mild cases of gastrointestinal dysmotility is probably not warranted at this stage.
评估口服红霉素作为促动力剂治疗早产极低出生体重儿中度严重胃肠动力障碍的有效性。
在一所大学教学医院的三级转诊中心,对56例连续入住新生儿病房的早产婴儿(<1500g)进行了一项前瞻性、双盲、随机、安慰剂对照研究。根据最小化原则将婴儿随机分配,若在出生后第14天经肠道途径摄入的液体量少于每日总液体摄入量的一半或牛奶喂养量少于75ml/kg/天,则给予口服红霉素(12.5mg/kg,每6小时一次,共14天)或等量的安慰剂溶液(生理盐水)。比较两组在药物治疗后达到半量、四分之三量和全量肠内喂养所需的时间。评估口服红霉素的潜在不良反应以及与肠外营养相关的并发症作为次要结局。
分别有27例和29例婴儿接受了口服红霉素和安慰剂溶液。接受口服红霉素组在药物治疗后达到半量、四分之三量和全量肠内喂养所需的时间显著短于接受安慰剂组(分别为p<0.05、p<0.05和p<0.0001)。也有趋势表明,与口服红霉素组相比,安慰剂组中更多喂养不耐受时间延长的婴儿发生了胆汁淤积性黄疸(10例对5例)。接受口服红霉素的婴儿均未发生心律失常、幽门狭窄或多重耐药菌引起的败血症。
口服红霉素对促进中度严重胃肠动力障碍的早产极低出生体重儿的肠内喂养有效。接受治疗的婴儿可提前10天实现全量肠内喂养,这可能会大幅节省高营养治疗费用。然而,在早产婴儿中红霉素的安全性得到确认之前,这种治疗方式应仍属试验性。现阶段可能不适合将此药物用于预防或常规治疗轻度胃肠动力障碍病例。