Geyman J P, Bliss E
Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle 98195, USA.
Fam Med. 2001 Apr;33(4):259-67.
This paper presents a 60-year view of family practice, including its first 30 years and best projections for its next 30 years as a discipline and field of practice.
An objective cross-generational approach was taken based on available evidence.
Five lessons are drawn from the past 30 years: (1) Neither medical education, medical practice, nor the health care system have been reformed by family medicine. (2) Family practice remains but one of several options for primary care. (3) The generalist-specialist ratio has shifted farther to specialists since 1970. (4) The United States is unique among Western industrialized nations in having multiple generalist specialties. (5) The three primary care specialties are on parallel but separate courses. The health care system is now very different from that of 1970, as a result of managed care; increased burden of chronic illness in an aging population; de-emphasis of hospital care; proliferation of primary care providers; increased emphasis on shared decision making with patients, cost-effectiveness, and value of health care services; and advances in information and communication technology.
The following course changes are recommended for family practice: (1) Embrace new paradigms of care (eg, evidence-based medicine, population-based care, chronic disease management). (2) Modify practice style and redesign systems of care. (3) Embrace further differentiation within family practice. (4) Reassess and revise educational programs at all levels. (5) Increase emphasis on practice-based research and expansion of clinical electronic databases. (6) Explore feasibility of a unified generalist discipline through new alliances with other primary care specialties. (7) Build organizational and political strength through alliances in advocating for structural change of the health care system to include universal coverage and a generalist primary care physician for all Americans.
本文呈现了对家庭医疗60年的展望,涵盖其最初30年以及作为一门学科和实践领域对未来30年的最佳预测。
基于现有证据采用客观的跨代际方法。
从过去30年中汲取了五点经验教训:(1)家庭医学未对医学教育、医疗实践或医疗保健系统进行改革。(2)家庭医疗仍然只是初级保健的几种选择之一。(3)自1970年以来,通科医生与专科医生的比例进一步向专科医生倾斜。(4)美国在西方工业化国家中独一无二,拥有多个通科专科。(5)三个初级保健专科处于平行但独立的发展进程。由于管理式医疗;老龄化人口中慢性病负担增加;对医院护理的重视程度降低;初级保健提供者的激增;对与患者共同决策、成本效益和医疗保健服务价值的重视增加;以及信息和通信技术的进步,如今的医疗保健系统与1970年时已大不相同。
建议家庭医疗做出以下发展方向的改变:(1)接受新的护理模式(如循证医学、基于人群的护理、慢性病管理)。(2)改变执业方式并重新设计护理系统。(3)在家庭医疗内部进一步实现差异化。(4)重新评估和修订各级教育项目。(5)更加重视基于实践的研究并扩大临床电子数据库。(6)通过与其他初级保健专科建立新联盟,探索统一通科专科的可行性。(7)通过联盟增强组织和政治力量,倡导对医疗保健系统进行结构变革,以实现全民覆盖并为所有美国人配备一名通科初级保健医生。