Evans E M, Arngrimsson S A, Cureton K J
Department of Exercise Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602-6554, USA.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001 May;33(5):839-45. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200105000-00026.
The purpose of this study was to compare estimates of body fat (%BF) from three- and four-component models with total body water (TBW) determined by single-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA; %BF3C-BIA and %BF4C-BIA) to %BF estimates from densitometry (%BF2C-D) and from three- and four-component models with TBW determined using deuterium dilution (%BF3C-D2O and %BF4C-D2O), the criterion methods.
Measures of body density by hydrostatic weighing, TBW by BIA and D2O dilution, and bone mineral by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) were obtained in 40 men and 93 women, 18-42 yr. TBW was estimated from BIA resistance (RJL analyzer) using an equation developed and cross-validated in two independent samples. Body fat was estimated using the three-component model of Siri (1961) and a four-component model modified from Lohman (1986).
There was a strong relation and no significant difference between TBW estimated by BIA and D2O [r = 0.94, SEE = 2.4; xDiff = 0.0 +/- 2.4 L (SD), P > 0.05]. There were strong relations between methods for estimating %BF, with deviations from %BF4C-D2O (errors) for %BF3C-BIA [r = 0.99, SEE = 2.4% BF, xDiff = -0.4 +/- 2.4% BF (SD)] and %BF4C-BIA [r = 0.99, SEE = 2.3% BF, xDiff = 0.2 +/- 2.3% BF (SD)] being nonsignificant (P > 0.05) although greater than for %BF3C-D2O [r = 1.00, SEE = 0.5% BF, xDiff = -0.6 +/- 0.5% BF (SD)], and comparable or slightly worse than for %BF2C-D [r = 0.99, SEE = 2.3% BF, xDiff = 0.4 +/- 2.3% BF (SD)].
We conclude that because estimates of %BF from multicomponent models with TBW estimated from BIA are not more accurate than from body density alone using a two-component model, estimates of %BF from three- and four-component models using TBWBIA are not acceptable substitutes for estimates from the same models using TBWD2O.
本研究旨在比较通过单频生物电阻抗分析(BIA)测定的全身水含量(TBW),从三分量和四分量模型得出的体脂率(%BF)估计值(%BF3C - BIA和%BF4C - BIA),与密度测量法得出的%BF估计值(%BF2C - D),以及使用氘稀释法测定TBW的三分量和四分量模型得出的%BF估计值(%BF3C - D2O和%BF4C - D2O)(标准方法)。
对40名男性和93名年龄在18 - 42岁的女性进行了人体密度的静水称重测量、通过BIA和氘稀释法进行的TBW测量以及通过双能X线吸收法(DXA)进行的骨矿物质测量。使用在两个独立样本中开发并交叉验证的方程,根据BIA电阻(RJL分析仪)估计TBW。使用Siri(1961年)的三分量模型和从Lohman(1986年)修改而来的四分量模型估计体脂。
通过BIA和氘稀释法估计的TBW之间存在强相关性且无显著差异[r = 0.94,标准误(SEE)= 2.4;平均差异(xDiff)= 0.0 ± 2.4 L(标准差),P > 0.05]。估计%BF的方法之间存在强相关性,%BF3C - BIA相对于%BF4C - D2O的偏差(误差)[r = 0.99,SEE = 2.4% BF,xDiff = -0.4 ± 2.4% BF(标准差)]和%BF4C - BIA相对于%BF4C - D2O的偏差[r = 0.99,SEE = 2.3% BF,xDiff = 0.2 ± 2.3% BF(标准差)]不显著(P > 0.05),尽管大于%BF3C - D2O相对于%BF4C - D2O的偏差[r = 1.00,SEE = 0.5% BF,xDiff = -0.6 ± 0.5% BF(标准差)],并且与%BF2C - D相对于%BF4C - D2O的偏差相当或略差[r = 0.99,SEE = 2.3% BF,xDiff = 0.4 ± 2.3% BF(标准差)]。
我们得出结论,由于使用BIA估计TBW的多分量模型得出的%BF估计值并不比仅使用双分量模型通过身体密度得出的更准确,因此使用TBW - BIA的三分量和四分量模型得出的%BF估计值不能替代使用TBW - D2O的相同模型得出的估计值。