Bouschlicher M R, Rueggeberg F A, Boyer D B
Department of Operative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
J Esthet Dent. 2000;12(1):23-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2000.tb00195.x.
This study evaluated the effect of stepped light intensity on the polymerization shrinkage forces and degrees of conversion of a hybrid composite.
Composite specimens were bonded between two steel rods (5.00 mm diameter, 1.25 mm apart, configuration factor = 2) mounted in a universal testing machine using a constant displacement mode. Polymerization contraction force was recorded for 300 seconds under four light exposure conditions: group 1: 40 s x 800 mW/cm2; group 2: 10 s x 100 mW/cm2 + 30 s x 800 mW/cm2; group 3: 60 s x 800 mW/cm2; group 4: 10 s x 100 mW/cm2 + 50 s x 800 mW/cm2. Maximum curing force (N300 s) and maximum force rate of the four groups were compared using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (alpha = 0.05) and the Tukey test. Degree of conversion in all groups was evaluated at two depths (top surface and 2 mm) using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR).
Mean maximum shrinkage forces and standard deviations (SD) were: group 1, 177 N (SD = 23); group 2, 172 N (SD = 11); group 3, 213 N (SD = 15); group 4, 197 N (SD = 17). Mean maximum forces for stepped and standard groups with the same duration (1 and 2; 3 and 4) were not statistically different; means for groups 2 and 3 were statistically different. Maximum force rates were not significantly different (p = .1548). Force:time curves were S-shaped. Specimens exposed to stepped curing exhibited longer delays before force was recorded. Mode of curing was shown not to contribute to overall cure, but both duration of cure and the depth (top surface vs. 2.00 mm) were significant with an interaction effect.
本研究评估了逐步增加光强度对混合复合材料聚合收缩力和转化率的影响。
使用恒定位移模式,将复合试件粘结在安装于万能试验机中的两根钢棒(直径5.00毫米,间距1.25毫米,形状系数=2)之间。在四种光照条件下记录300秒的聚合收缩力:第1组:40秒×800毫瓦/平方厘米;第2组:10秒×100毫瓦/平方厘米+30秒×800毫瓦/平方厘米;第3组:60秒×800毫瓦/平方厘米;第4组:10秒×100毫瓦/平方厘米+50秒×800毫瓦/平方厘米。使用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)(α=0.05)和Tukey检验比较四组的最大固化力(N300秒)和最大力率。使用傅里叶变换红外光谱(FTIR)在两个深度(顶面和2毫米)评估所有组的转化率。
平均最大收缩力和标准差(SD)分别为:第1组,177牛(SD=23);第2组,172牛(SD=11);第3组,213牛(SD=15);第4组,197牛(SD=17)。相同持续时间的逐步固化组和标准组(1和2;3和4)的平均最大力无统计学差异;第2组和第3组的平均值有统计学差异。最大力率无显著差异(p=0.1548)。力-时间曲线为S形。接受逐步固化的试件在记录到力之前延迟时间更长。固化方式对整体固化无影响,但固化持续时间和深度(顶面与2.00毫米)均有显著影响且存在交互作用。