Suppr超能文献

二甲基丙烯酸酯、有机陶瓷和硅氧烷复合材料的收缩率、应力及模量。

Shrinkage, stress, and modulus of dimethacrylate, ormocer, and silorane composites.

作者信息

Bacchi Atais, Feitosa Victor Pinheiro, da Silva Fonseca Andrea Soares Quirino, Cavalcante Larissa Maria Assad, Silikas Nikolaos, Schneider Luis Felipe Jochins

机构信息

Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Meridional Faculty - IMED, Passo Fundo, RS, Brazil.

Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.

出版信息

J Conserv Dent. 2015 Sep-Oct;18(5):384-8. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.164051.

Abstract

PURPOSE

to evaluate the shrinkage, polymerization stress, elastic and bulk modulus resulting from composites formulated by siloranes, 2(nd) generation ormocers, and dimethacrylates.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The bonded disc method was used to evaluate volumetric shrinkage. The polymerization stress was evaluated by mean of the Bioman. Cylindrical specimens (5 mm thickness and 6 mm diameter) were submitted to gradual loading. Young's and bulk modulus were obtained from the slope of the stress/strain curve. Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and Tukey's test (5%).

RESULTS

Grandio and ormocer showed significant higher elastic and bulk modulus. Silorane presented significant lowest bulk modulus and maximum shrinkage. Ormocer and silorane presented lower values for the maximum rate of shrinkage. Extra-low shrinkage (ELS) composite presented the greatest maximum shrinkage. The higher maximum rate of shrinkage was attained by Grandio and ELS, statistically similar from each other. The silorane showed lower values of maximum stress and maximum rate of stress. The higher values of maximum stress were presented by ELS and Grandio, statistical similar between them. Grandio showed the significantly greatest maximum rate of stress.

CONCLUSION

Silorane showed to promote lower shrinkage/stress among the composites, with the lowest elastic modulus. Ormocer showed lower shrinkage/stress than methacrylates despite of its high modulus.

摘要

目的

评估由硅氧烷、第二代有机金属陶瓷和二甲基丙烯酸酯配制的复合材料的收缩率、聚合应力、弹性模量和体积模量。

材料与方法

采用粘结圆盘法评估体积收缩率。通过Bioman评估聚合应力。将圆柱形试件(厚度5mm,直径6mm)进行逐步加载。从应力/应变曲线的斜率获得杨氏模量和体积模量。使用单向方差分析和Tukey检验(5%)分析数据。

结果

Grandio和有机金属陶瓷显示出显著更高的弹性模量和体积模量。硅氧烷的体积模量显著最低,收缩率最大。有机金属陶瓷和硅氧烷的最大收缩率较低。超低收缩(ELS)复合材料的最大收缩率最大。Grandio和ELS的最大收缩率较高,两者在统计学上相似。硅氧烷的最大应力和最大应力率较低。ELS和Grandio的最大应力值较高,两者在统计学上相似。Grandio的最大应力率显著最大。

结论

硅氧烷在复合材料中表现出较低的收缩率/应力,弹性模量最低。有机金属陶瓷尽管模量较高,但收缩率/应力比甲基丙烯酸酯低。

相似文献

10
Resin composite restorative materials.树脂复合材料修复材料。
Aust Dent J. 2011 Jun;56 Suppl 1:59-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2010.01296.x.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

4
Resin composite--state of the art.树脂复合材料——最新技术。
Dent Mater. 2011 Jan;27(1):29-38. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.020. Epub 2010 Nov 18.
5
Alternatives in polymerization contraction stress management.聚合收缩应力管理的替代方法。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2004;12(spe):1-11. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572004000500002.
7
Update on dental nanocomposites.牙科纳米复合材料的最新进展。
J Dent Res. 2010 Jun;89(6):549-60. doi: 10.1177/0022034510363765. Epub 2010 Mar 18.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验