Theodoratos G, Papanikolaou A, Apergis E, Maris J
Orthopaedic Department, Hellenic Red Cross Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Injury. 2001 May;32(4):313-5. doi: 10.1016/s0020-1383(00)00189-3.
We present our experience of intramedullary nailing (IM) and external fixation in the treatment of 54 patients with ipsilateral diaphyseal fractures of the femur and tibia. Eight femoral and 24 tibial fractures were open. They were classified into three groups: IM nailing of both fractures (group A, 19 patients); IM nailing of the femoral and external fixation of the tibial fracture (group B, eight patients); and external fixation of both fractures (group C, 27 patients). In group C (which included all but one grade III open fracture), two patients died and four underwent amputation. Femoral fractures treated with external fixation had significantly more complications and reoperations than those treated with IM nailing. In tibial fractures this difference was also present but not statistically significant. We believe that IM nailing is the method of choice for femoral fractures and is preferable for tibial fractures, with the exception probably of grade III B and C open injuries.
我们介绍了采用髓内钉固定(IM)和外固定治疗54例同侧股骨干和胫骨干骨折患者的经验。8例股骨骨折和24例胫骨骨折为开放性骨折。患者被分为三组:两处骨折均采用髓内钉固定(A组,19例患者);股骨采用髓内钉固定,胫骨骨折采用外固定(B组,8例患者);两处骨折均采用外固定(C组,27例患者)。在C组(除1例Ⅲ级开放性骨折外均纳入该组)中,2例患者死亡,4例接受了截肢手术。与采用髓内钉固定治疗的股骨骨折相比,采用外固定治疗的股骨骨折并发症和再次手术明显更多。在胫骨骨折中也存在这种差异,但无统计学意义。我们认为,髓内钉固定是治疗股骨骨折的首选方法,对于胫骨骨折可能也是更可取的方法,但ⅢB级和ⅢC级开放性损伤可能除外。