Suppr超能文献

用于临床标本中肺炎衣原体检测和定量的重复聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测及概率分析。

Replicate PCR testing and probit analysis for detection and quantitation of Chlamydia pneumoniae in clinical specimens.

作者信息

Smieja M, Mahony J B, Goldsmith C H, Chong S, Petrich A, Chernesky M

机构信息

Hamilton Regional Laboratory Medicine Programme, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 2001 May;39(5):1796-801. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.5.1796-1801.2001.

Abstract

Nucleic acid amplification of clinical specimens with low target concentration has variable sensitivity. We examined whether testing multiple aliquots of extracted DNA increased the sensitivity and reproducibility of Chlamydia pneumoniae detection by PCR. Nested and non-nested C. pneumoniae PCR assays were compared using 10 replicates of 16 serial dilutions of C. pneumoniae ATCC VR-1310. The proportion positive versus the C. pneumoniae concentration was modeled by probit regression analysis. To validate the model, 10 replicates of 26 previously positive patient specimens of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), sputum, or nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS) were tested. The proportion of replicates that were positive varied with the concentration of C. pneumoniae in the sample. At concentrations above 5 infection-forming units (IFU)/ml, both nested and non-nested PCR assay sensitivities were 90% or greater. The nested PCR was more sensitive (median detection, 0.35 versus 0.61 IFU/ml; relative median detection, 0.58; 95% confidence interval, 0.31 to 0.99; P = 0.04). In clinical specimens, replicate PCR detected 15 of 26 (nested) versus 1 of 26 (non-nested, P < 0.001). For PBMC specimens, testing 1, 3, or 5 replicates detected 3, 5, or 9 of 10 positive specimens, respectively. Median C. pneumoniae concentrations were estimated at 0.07 IFU/ml for PBMC and at <0.03 IFU/ml for NPS specimens. We conclude that performing 5 or 10 replicates considerably increased the sensitivity and reproducibility of C. pneumoniae PCR and enabled quantitation for clinical specimens. Due to sampling variability, PCR tests done without replication may miss a large proportion of positive specimens, particularly for specimens with small amounts of target C. pneumoniae DNA present.

摘要

对低靶标浓度的临床标本进行核酸扩增,其灵敏度存在差异。我们研究了检测多份提取的DNA样本是否能提高通过聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测肺炎衣原体的灵敏度和可重复性。使用肺炎衣原体ATCC VR - 1310的16个系列稀释度的10份重复样本,比较了巢式和非巢式肺炎衣原体PCR检测方法。通过概率回归分析对阳性比例与肺炎衣原体浓度之间的关系进行建模。为验证该模型,对26份先前检测为阳性的外周血单个核细胞(PBMC)标本、痰液标本或鼻咽拭子(NPS)标本进行了10份重复检测。重复样本的阳性比例随样本中肺炎衣原体的浓度而变化。在浓度高于5个感染形成单位(IFU)/毫升时,巢式和非巢式PCR检测的灵敏度均达到90%或更高。巢式PCR更灵敏(中位检测值,0.35对0.61 IFU/毫升;相对中位检测值,0.58;95%置信区间,0.31至0.99;P = 0.04)。在临床标本中,重复PCR检测出26份标本中的15份(巢式),而非巢式仅检测出1份(P < 0.001)。对于PBMC标本,检测1份、3份或5份重复样本分别检测出10份阳性标本中的3份、5份或9份。PBMC标本的肺炎衣原体中位浓度估计为0.07 IFU/毫升,NPS标本的中位浓度估计小于0.03 IFU/毫升。我们得出结论,进行5次或10次重复检测可显著提高肺炎衣原体PCR的灵敏度和可重复性,并能够对临床标本进行定量分析。由于抽样变异性,未进行重复检测的PCR试验可能会遗漏很大一部分阳性标本,特别是对于那些含有少量靶标肺炎衣原体DNA的标本。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

8
10
Molecular diagnosis of Chlamydia pneumoniae infection.肺炎衣原体感染的分子诊断
J Clin Microbiol. 1999 Dec;37(12):3791-9. doi: 10.1128/JCM.37.12.3791-3799.1999.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验