Suarez T, Miller J
Center for AIDS Intervention Research, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Wisconsin, USA.
Arch Sex Behav. 2001 Jun;30(3):287-300. doi: 10.1023/a:1002700130455.
Recently, an alarming trend toward unprotected anal intercourse has emerged in men who have sex with men. A highly dangerous form of unprotected anal intercourse, barebacking--the deliberate and conscious choice to engage in anal sex without condoms knowing that there are risks involved--has received much attention in the gay press. This trend poses new challenges for HIV prevention. As the target population changes, prevention interventions must also evolve to remain effective. A review of the scientific literature on risk behaviors and the popular literature and websites devoted to barebacking suggests that many contextual factors influence the decision to engage in unprotected anal intercourse. This review examines the most salient contextual factors affecting risk behavior in gay/bisexual men. It also identifies four main cohorts and predominant contextual factors that appear to motivate unprotected anal intercourse in each. In answering the question "where do we go from here," we conclude that contextual issues must be addressed in hybrid prevention interventions that include harm reduction, motivational interviewing, and traditional approaches.
最近,男同性恋者中出现了一种无保护肛交的惊人趋势。一种高度危险的无保护肛交形式,即“无套肛交”(明知存在风险仍故意选择不使用避孕套进行肛交),在同性恋媒体上受到了广泛关注。这种趋势给艾滋病预防带来了新的挑战。随着目标人群的变化,预防干预措施也必须不断发展以保持有效性。对关于风险行为的科学文献以及专门讨论无套肛交的通俗文献和网站的综述表明,许多背景因素会影响进行无保护肛交的决定。本综述考察了影响男同性恋者/双性恋男性风险行为的最显著背景因素。它还确定了四个主要群体以及似乎促使每个群体进行无保护肛交的主要背景因素。在回答“我们从这里走向何方”这个问题时,我们得出结论,在包括减少伤害、动机性访谈和传统方法的综合预防干预措施中,必须解决背景问题。