Minnis A M, Padian N S
Center for Reproductive Health Research and Policy, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco 94105-3444, USA.
J Adolesc Health. 2001 May;28(5):394-403. doi: 10.1016/s1054-139x(00)00218-4.
To evaluate techniques for measuring high-risk sexual behaviors by comparing the reliability and acceptability of two daily sexual behavior diary modes: a written calendar and an automated telephone interview.
This randomized controlled study included 105 sexually active female adolescents aged 15-19 years recruited from among teens seeking reproductive health care services at a family planning clinic in the San Francisco Bay Area. Participants completed a standardized sexual behavior questionnaire each day for 4 weeks. Contraceptive use by method type was recorded. Reporting differences between the two diary modes were assessed using generalized estimating equations, concordance of diary and retrospective interview responses was evaluated using kappa statistics, and contingency table analysis and Poisson regression models were constructed to examine mode acceptability.
Respondents randomized to the telephone diary cohort reported less frequent use of barrier contraceptive methods, specifically less spermicide use (odds ratio 0.27, 95% confidence interval 0.08, 0.95), and decreasing male condom use over time, whereas reports of male condom use increased for written diary respondents (p = .007). Participant characteristics associated with diary acceptability, defined as the frequency of diary completion, were assessed and teens classified as higher risk provided fewer diary reports (p < .01). Regardless of mode completed, 65% of respondents believed the telephone diary would be preferable to the written diary for most teens.
The automated telephone diary offered an acceptable, even preferred, methodologic alternative to the written diary calendar and elicited more accurate reporting of selected contraceptive behavior.
通过比较两种日常性行为日记模式(书面日历和自动电话访谈)的可靠性和可接受性,评估测量高风险性行为的技术。
这项随机对照研究纳入了105名年龄在15至19岁之间、有性行为的女性青少年,她们是从旧金山湾区一家计划生育诊所寻求生殖健康护理服务的青少年中招募的。参与者在4周内每天完成一份标准化的性行为问卷。记录按方法类型划分的避孕措施使用情况。使用广义估计方程评估两种日记模式之间的报告差异,使用kappa统计量评估日记与回顾性访谈回答的一致性,并构建列联表分析和泊松回归模型来检验模式的可接受性。
随机分配到电话日记队列的受访者报告使用屏障避孕方法的频率较低,特别是使用杀精剂的频率较低(比值比0.27,95%置信区间0.08,0.95),并且随着时间的推移男性避孕套的使用减少,而书面日记受访者报告的男性避孕套使用增加(p = 0.007)。评估了与日记可接受性相关的参与者特征(定义为日记完成频率),被归类为高风险的青少年提供的日记报告较少(p < 0.01)。无论完成哪种模式,65%的受访者认为对于大多数青少年来说,电话日记比书面日记更可取。
自动电话日记提供了一种可接受的、甚至更可取的方法替代书面日记日历,并能更准确地报告选定的避孕行为。