Section of Adolescent Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012 Jun 12;12:75. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-75.
Self-reports of sensitive, socially stigmatized or illegal behavior are common in STI/HIV research, but can raise challenges in terms of data reliability and validity. The use of electronic data collection tools, including ecological momentary assessment (EMA), can increase the accuracy of this information by allowing a participant to self-administer a survey or diary entry, in their own environment, as close to the occurrence of the behavior as possible. In this paper, we evaluate the feasibility of using cell phone-based EMA as a tool for understanding sexual risk and STI among adult men and women.
As part of a larger prospective clinical study on sexual risk behavior and incident STI in clinically recruited adult men and women, using study-provided cell phones, participants (N = 243) completed thrice-daily EMA diaries monitoring individual and partner-specific emotional attributes, non-sexual activities, non-coital or coital sexual behaviors, and contraceptive behaviors. Using these data, we assess feasibility in terms of participant compliance, behavior reactivity, general method acceptability and method efficacy for capturing behaviors.
Participants were highly compliant with diary entry protocol and schedule: over the entire 12 study weeks, participants submitted 89.7% (54,914/61,236) of the expected diary entries, with an average of 18.86 of the 21 expected diaries (85.7%) each week. Submission did not differ substantially across gender, race/ethnicity and baseline sexually transmitted infection status. A sufficient volume and range of sexual behaviors were captured, with reporting trends in different legal and illegal behaviors showing small variation over time. Participants found the methodology to be acceptable, enjoyed and felt comfortable participating in the study.
Achieving the correct medium of data collection can drastically improve, or degrade, the timeliness and quality of an individual's self-reported sexual risk behavior, which in turn, is a key factor in the success of intervention or education programs relying on this information. Our findings demonstrate that completion of electronic diaries via cellular phone is feasible way to describe STI/HIV risk among clinically recruited adult men and women.
在性传播感染/艾滋病(STI/HIV)研究中,自我报告敏感、社会耻辱或非法行为很常见,但这可能会给数据的可靠性和有效性带来挑战。使用电子数据收集工具,包括生态瞬时评估(EMA),可以通过让参与者在自己的环境中尽可能接近行为发生的时间,自我管理调查或日记条目,从而提高这些信息的准确性。在本文中,我们评估了基于手机的 EMA 作为一种工具来了解成年男女的性风险和性传播感染的可行性。
作为一项关于临床招募的成年男女性行为风险和新发性传播感染的前瞻性临床研究的一部分,参与者(N=243)使用研究提供的手机,每天完成三次 EMA 日记记录,监测个人和伴侣特定的情绪属性、非性活动、非性交或性交性行为以及避孕行为。使用这些数据,我们评估了参与者的依从性、行为反应性、一般方法可接受性以及捕获行为的方法效果方面的可行性。
参与者非常遵守日记条目协议和日程安排:在整个 12 周的研究期间,参与者提交了 89.7%(54,914/61,236)的预期日记条目,平均每周提交 18.86 份(85.7%)21 份预期日记中的日记条目。在性别、种族/族裔和基线性传播感染状况方面,提交情况没有显著差异。捕获到了足够数量和范围的性行为,不同合法和非法行为的报告趋势随着时间的推移变化很小。参与者认为该方法是可以接受的,他们享受并感到舒适地参与了这项研究。
选择正确的数据收集媒介可以极大地提高或降低个体自我报告性行为风险的及时性和质量,而这反过来又是依赖这些信息的干预或教育计划成功的关键因素。我们的研究结果表明,通过手机完成电子日记是描述临床招募的成年男女性传播感染/艾滋病风险的一种可行方法。