Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog?
作者信息
Barbour R S
机构信息
Department of General Practice, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 0RR.
出版信息
BMJ. 2001 May 5;322(7294):1115-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7294.1115.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog?提高定性研究严谨性的清单：是本末倒置吗？
BMJ. 2001 May 5;322(7294):1115-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7294.1115.
2
3
Explicit guidelines for qualitative research: a step in the right direction, a defence of the 'soft' option, or a form of sociological imperialism?定性研究的明确指南：朝着正确方向迈出的一步、对“软”方法的辩护，还是一种社会学帝国主义形式？
Fam Pract. 1998 Dec;15(6):556-61. doi: 10.1093/fampra/15.6.556.
4
Qualitative approaches in health research.
N Z Med J. 2000 Nov 10;113(1121):454-5.
5
Understanding and utilizing qualitative research.理解与运用定性研究。
J Dent Educ. 1996 Aug;60(8):716-20.
6
Rigour and qualitative research.严谨性与定性研究。
BMJ. 1995 Jul 8;311(6997):109-12. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.6997.109.
7
Integrating qualitative and quantitative components in evaluation of case management.在病例管理评估中整合定性和定量要素。
NIDA Res Monogr. 1992;127:223-50.
8
[Quality control and assessment of qualitative interview in health care research].[医疗保健研究中定性访谈的质量控制与评估]
Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao. 2008 Jul;6(7):668-73. doi: 10.3736/jcim20080702.
9
Evidence-based care: enhancing the rigour of a qualitative study.循证护理：提高定性研究的严谨性
Br J Nurs. 2008;17(20):1286-9. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2008.17.20.31645.
10
Assessing the strengths and weaknesses of action research.评估行动研究的优缺点。
Nurs Stand. 2001;15(26):33-5. doi: 10.7748/ns2001.03.15.26.33.c2994.
引用本文的文献
1
Advance care planning in the perioperative setting: a mixed methods study of anaesthetists' knowledge, attitudes and practice.围手术期的预先护理计划：一项关于麻醉医生的知识、态度和实践的混合方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 28;15(8):e101642. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101642.
2
A qualitative analysis of young adults' beliefs about bullying: exploring associations with social anxiety and post-traumatic stress.对年轻人关于欺凌的信念的定性分析：探索与社交焦虑和创伤后应激的关联。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025 Dec;16(1):2523638. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2025.2523638. Epub 2025 Jul 18.
3
Understanding the self-management experiences of people with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), their caregivers and the health care professionals who support them: Systematic review and qualitative meta-study.了解射血分数保留的心力衰竭（HFpEF）患者、其照护者以及为他们提供支持的医疗保健专业人员的自我管理体验：系统评价与定性荟萃研究。
Br J Card Nurs. 2025 Jun 2;20(6):1-30. doi: 10.12968/bjca.2024.0084.
4
Perspectives of Health Care Professionals on the Use of AI to Support Clinical Decision-Making in the Management of Multiple Long-Term Conditions: Interview Study.医疗保健专业人员对使用人工智能支持多种慢性病管理中临床决策的看法：访谈研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jul 4;27:e71980. doi: 10.2196/71980.
5
Pancreatic Cancer Risk Assessment Tools in Primary Care: A Mixed Methods Systematic Review.初级保健中的胰腺癌风险评估工具：一项混合方法的系统评价。
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2025 Jun 5;56(1):128. doi: 10.1007/s12029-025-01229-5.
6
Research assistants' experiences recruiting patients with psychosis into clinical trials: a qualitative study.研究助理招募精神病患者参与临床试验的经历：一项定性研究。
Trials. 2025 May 30;26(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-08882-y.
7
Assistive technology: Occupational therapy assessment and services for people with dementia.辅助技术：针对痴呆症患者的职业治疗评估与服务
Br J Occup Ther. 2024 Sep;87(9):564-573. doi: 10.1177/03080226241252280. Epub 2024 May 21.
8
Perceptions and Experiences of a Multimodal Rehabilitation Program for People With Post-Acute COVID-19: A Qualitative Study.急性 COVID-19 后患者多模式康复计划的认知与体验：一项定性研究
Health Expect. 2025 Jun;28(3):e70283. doi: 10.1111/hex.70283.
9
The Impact of COVID-19 on Healthcare Services, Risk Management, and Infection Prevention in Surgical Settings: A Qualitative Study.新型冠状病毒肺炎对手术环境下医疗服务、风险管理及感染预防的影响：一项定性研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Mar 7;13(6):579. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13060579.
10
Developing a questionnaire to explore lay people's preferences for communicating hereditary conditions within families: insights from a cognitive interview study.编制一份问卷以探究非专业人士在家庭内部交流遗传疾病方面的偏好：认知访谈研究的见解
J Community Genet. 2025 Mar 18. doi: 10.1007/s12687-025-00783-6.
本文引用的文献
1
Qualitative research in health care. Assessing quality in qualitative research.医疗保健中的定性研究。评估定性研究的质量。
BMJ. 2000 Jan 1;320(7226):50-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7226.50.
2
Using reflexivity to optimize teamwork in qualitative research.利用反思性优化定性研究中的团队协作。
Qual Health Res. 1999 Jan;9(1):26-44. doi: 10.1177/104973299129121677.
3
Mixing qualitative methods: quality assurance or qualitative quagmire?混合定性方法：质量保证还是定性困境？
Qual Health Res. 1998 May;8(3):352-61. doi: 10.1177/104973239800800306.
4
Rationale and standards for the systematic review of qualitative literature in health services research.卫生服务研究中定性文献系统评价的基本原理与标准
Qual Health Res. 1998 May;8(3):341-51. doi: 10.1177/104973239800800305.
5
The case for combining qualitative and quantitative approaches in health services research.卫生服务研究中定性与定量方法相结合的理由。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 1999 Jan;4(1):39-43. doi: 10.1177/135581969900400110.
6
Commentary: grounded theory and the constant comparative method.评论：扎根理论与持续比较法
BMJ. 1998 Apr 4;316(7137):1064-5.
7
Qualitative methods: beyond the cookbook.定性方法：超越菜谱式做法
Fam Pract. 1998 Feb;15(1):76-9. doi: 10.1093/fampra/15.1.76.
8
A review of recently published qualitative research in general practice. More methodological questions than answers?对近期发表的全科医学定性研究的综述。方法学问题比答案更多？
Fam Pract. 1997 Aug;14(4):313-9. doi: 10.1093/fampra/14.4.313.
9
Rigour and qualitative research.严谨性与定性研究。
BMJ. 1995 Jul 8;311(6997):109-12. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.6997.109.
Zotero 插件