• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

卫生服务研究中定性与定量方法相结合的理由。

The case for combining qualitative and quantitative approaches in health services research.

作者信息

Barbour R S

机构信息

Department of General Practice, University of Glasgow, UK.

出版信息

J Health Serv Res Policy. 1999 Jan;4(1):39-43. doi: 10.1177/135581969900400110.

DOI:10.1177/135581969900400110
PMID:10345565
Abstract

A judicious combination of qualitative and quantitative methods can play a valuable role in health services research. This paper reviews the main reasons for combining methods: for different stages in a project; to compensate for the shortcomings of individual methods; and for the purpose of 'triangulation'. It examines the potential for qualitative approaches to contribute to quantitative work--by providing insights into the process of data construction, identifying relevant variables to be studied, furnishing explanations for unexpected or anomalous findings, and generating hypotheses or research questions for further investigation. Similarly, qualitative work can be enhanced by using quantitative techniques--albeit often in a modified form--in analysing data, developing sampling strategies, and amalgamating findings from separate qualitative studies. Although there is potential to develop multi-method approaches, there remains an important role for rigorous studies employing either qualitative or quantitative methods.

摘要

定性方法与定量方法的明智结合在卫生服务研究中可以发挥重要作用。本文回顾了方法结合的主要原因:针对项目的不同阶段;弥补个别方法的不足;以及出于“三角互证”的目的。它探讨了定性方法对定量研究做出贡献的潜力——通过深入了解数据构建过程、识别待研究的相关变量、为意外或异常发现提供解释,以及生成供进一步研究的假设或研究问题。同样,定性研究也可以通过使用定量技术(尽管通常是经过修改的形式)来加强,用于分析数据、制定抽样策略以及整合来自不同定性研究的结果。尽管有开发多方法途径的潜力,但采用定性或定量方法的严谨研究仍具有重要作用。

相似文献

1
The case for combining qualitative and quantitative approaches in health services research.卫生服务研究中定性与定量方法相结合的理由。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 1999 Jan;4(1):39-43. doi: 10.1177/135581969900400110.
2
Qualitative methods: what are they and why use them?定性方法:它们是什么以及为何要使用它们?
Health Serv Res. 1999 Dec;34(5 Pt 2):1101-18.
3
Qualitative research methods: key features and insights gained from use in infection prevention research.定性研究方法:在感染预防研究中的关键特征及应用所得见解
Am J Infect Control. 2008 Dec;36(10):764-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.03.010. Epub 2008 Oct 3.
4
Desirable features of qualitative research.定性研究的理想特征。
Fam Pract Res J. 1994 Dec;14(4):369-78.
5
The use of "mixing" procedure of mixed methods in health services research.混合方法在卫生服务研究中的“混合”程序的使用。
Med Care. 2013 Aug;51(8):e51-7. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31824642fd.
6
Qualitative research: Observational methods in health care settings.定性研究:医疗保健环境中的观察方法。
BMJ. 1995 Jul 15;311(6998):182-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.6998.182.
7
Mixing qualitative methods: quality assurance or qualitative quagmire?混合定性方法:质量保证还是定性困境?
Qual Health Res. 1998 May;8(3):352-61. doi: 10.1177/104973239800800306.
8
Qualitative and mixed methods in mental health services and implementation research.精神卫生服务和实施研究中的定性和混合方法。
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2014;43(6):851-61. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2014.910791.
9
Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis.提高定性分析的质量和可信度。
Health Serv Res. 1999 Dec;34(5 Pt 2):1189-208.
10
The problem of appraising qualitative research.定性研究的评估问题。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Jun;13(3):223-5. doi: 10.1136/qhc.13.3.223.

引用本文的文献

1
Using Mixed Methods to Evaluate Risk Minimisation Programs in Europe and the USA: An Innovative Blueprint.运用混合方法评估欧洲和美国的风险最小化计划:创新蓝图。
Drug Saf. 2025 Mar 12. doi: 10.1007/s40264-025-01533-w.
2
Increasing the Value of Health Intervention Trials: Qualitative Research in the Early Psychosis Intervention Network (EPINET).提升健康干预试验的价值:早期精神病干预网络(EPINET)中的定性研究
Community Ment Health J. 2025 Feb 18. doi: 10.1007/s10597-024-01427-8.
3
Enhancing clinical reasoning skills in medical students through team-based learning: a mixed-methods study.
通过基于团队的学习提高医学生的临床推理能力:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Feb 11;25(1):221. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06784-w.
4
Understanding Community Health Care Through Problem-Based Learning With Real-Patient Videos: Single-Arm Pre-Post Mixed Methods Study.通过基于问题的学习和真实患者视频理解社区医疗保健:单臂前后混合方法研究。
JMIR Med Educ. 2025 Jan 31;11:e68743. doi: 10.2196/68743.
5
Use of Framework Matrix and Thematic Coding Methods in Qualitative Analysis for mHealth: NIRUDAK Study Data.框架矩阵和主题编码方法在移动健康定性分析中的应用:NIRUDAK研究数据
Int J Qual Methods. 2023 Jan-Dec;22. doi: 10.1177/16094069231184123. Epub 2023 Jun 21.
6
The influence of Gamification on medical students' diagnostic decision making and awareness of medical cost: a mixed-method study.游戏化对医学生诊断决策和医疗成本意识的影响:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Oct 28;23(1):813. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04808-x.
7
The importance of combining open-ended and closed-ended questions when conducting patient satisfaction surveys in hospitals.在医院进行患者满意度调查时结合开放式和封闭式问题的重要性。
Health Policy Open. 2021 Jan 21;2:100033. doi: 10.1016/j.hpopen.2021.100033. eCollection 2021 Dec.
8
Hybrid PBL and Pure PBL: Which one is more effective in developing clinical reasoning skills for general medicine clerkship?-A mixed-method study.混合式 PBL 与纯 PBL:哪一种更能有效提升普通医学实习阶段的临床推理技能?——一项混合方法研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 23;18(1):e0279554. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279554. eCollection 2023.
9
Surveying Over the Counter and Prescription Only Medication Misuse in Treatment Services During COVID-19.调查新冠疫情期间治疗服务中滥用非处方药和处方药的情况。
Subst Abuse. 2022 Nov 8;16:11782218221135875. doi: 10.1177/11782218221135875. eCollection 2022.
10
Factors associated with catastrophic health expenditure in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review.与撒哈拉以南非洲灾难性卫生支出相关的因素:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 20;17(10):e0276266. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276266. eCollection 2022.