Nunn M E, Harrel S K
Department of Public Health Sciences, Baylor College of Dentistry, Dallas, TX, USA.
J Periodontol. 2001 Apr;72(4):485-94. doi: 10.1902/jop.2001.72.4.485.
A causal relationship between occlusal discrepancies and periodontal disease has been postulated in the past. However, animal studies and clinical studies have not been able to clearly demonstrate or rule out this potential relationship.
The records from a private practice limited to periodontics were reviewed to find patients who had complete periodontal examination records, including occlusal analysis, that were recorded at least 1 year apart. Patients who fit these criteria were divided into a group who had none of the recommended treatment (untreated n = 30), those that had only nonsurgical treatment (partially treated n = 18), and a control group that had complete all recommended treatment (surgically treated n = 41). The data for each tooth of each patient, including occlusal status, were placed in a database and analyzed using the generalized estimating equations (GEE) method to test for associations between initial occlusal discrepancies and various initial clinical parameters while adjusting for significant confounders.
Teeth with initial occlusal discrepancies were found to have significantly deeper initial probing depths (P < 0.0001), significantly worse prognoses (P < 0.0001), and significantly worse mobility than teeth without initial occlusal discrepancies. In addition, this association between initial occlusal discrepancies and initial periodontal condition was found to hold for various subsets considered as well, including posterior teeth only and when only patients with good oral hygiene were considered.
This study indicates that there is a strong association between initial occlusal discrepancies and various clinical parameters indicative of periodontal disease. Based on adjustments made for other known risk factors for periodontal disease, such as smoking, poor oral hygiene, etc., this study provides some evidence that occlusal discrepancy is an independent risk factor contributing to periodontal disease.
过去曾假定咬合差异与牙周病之间存在因果关系。然而,动物研究和临床研究均未能明确证实或排除这种潜在关系。
回顾一家仅限牙周病治疗的私人诊所的记录,以找出那些拥有完整牙周检查记录(包括咬合分析)且记录时间相隔至少1年的患者。符合这些标准的患者被分为未接受任何推荐治疗的一组(未治疗组,n = 30)、仅接受非手术治疗的一组(部分治疗组,n = 18)以及完成所有推荐治疗的对照组(手术治疗组,n = 41)。将每位患者每颗牙齿的数据(包括咬合状况)录入数据库,并使用广义估计方程(GEE)方法进行分析,以检验初始咬合差异与各种初始临床参数之间的关联,同时对显著的混杂因素进行校正。
发现存在初始咬合差异的牙齿,其初始探诊深度明显更深(P < 0.0001),预后明显更差(P < 0.0001),且松动度明显更差。此外,初始咬合差异与初始牙周状况之间的这种关联在各种亚组中也成立,包括仅后牙以及仅考虑口腔卫生良好的患者时。
本研究表明,初始咬合差异与各种表明牙周病的临床参数之间存在密切关联。基于对牙周病其他已知风险因素(如吸烟、口腔卫生差等)所做的校正,本研究提供了一些证据,表明咬合差异是导致牙周病的一个独立风险因素。