Kosowsky J M, Stephanides S L, Branson R D, Sayre M R
Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2001 Apr-Jun;5(2):190-6. doi: 10.1080/10903120190940119.
To describe the prehospital use of a continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) system for the treatment of acute respiratory failure presumed to be due to cardiogenic pulmonary edema.
Prospective case-series analysis. Paramedics administered CPAP via face mask at 10 cm H2O to patients believed to be in cardiogenic pulmonary edema and in imminent need of endotracheal intubation (ETI). Data from run sheets and hospital records were analyzed for treatment intervals, vital signs, complications, admitting diagnoses, need for ETI, and mortality.
Nineteen patients received prehospital CPAP therapy. Mean duration of therapy was 15.5 minutes. Pre- and post-therapy pulse oximetry was available for 15 patients and demonstrated an increase from a mean of 83.3% to a mean of 95.4%. None of the patients were intubated in the field. Two patients who did not tolerate the CPAP mask required ETI upon arrival in the emergency department (ED); an additional five patients required ETI within 24 hours. There was one death in the series and two additional adverse events (one aspiration pneumonia, one pneumothorax); none of these were attributable to the use of CPAP. The diagnosis of cardiogenic pulmonary edema was corroborated by the ED or in-hospital physician in 13 patients (68%). Paramedics reported no technical difficulties with the CPAP system.
For patients with acute respiratory failure and presumed pulmonary edema, the prehospital use of CPAP is feasible and may avert the need for ETI. Future controlled studies are needed to assess the utility and cost-effectiveness of prehospital CPAP systems.
描述院前使用持续气道正压通气(CPAP)系统治疗推测由心源性肺水肿导致的急性呼吸衰竭的情况。
前瞻性病例系列分析。护理人员通过面罩以10厘米水柱的压力对被认为患有心源性肺水肿且急需气管插管(ETI)的患者给予CPAP。分析运行记录和医院记录中的数据,以了解治疗间隔、生命体征、并发症、入院诊断、ETI需求和死亡率。
19名患者接受了院前CPAP治疗。平均治疗持续时间为15.5分钟。15名患者有治疗前和治疗后的脉搏血氧饱和度数据,显示从平均83.3%升至平均95.4%。现场无患者进行插管。两名不耐受CPAP面罩的患者在抵达急诊科(ED)时需要进行ETI;另有5名患者在24小时内需要进行ETI。该系列中有1例死亡和另外2例不良事件(1例吸入性肺炎,1例气胸);这些均与CPAP的使用无关。13名患者(68%)的心源性肺水肿诊断得到ED或住院医生的证实。护理人员报告CPAP系统无技术困难。
对于急性呼吸衰竭且推测为肺水肿的患者,院前使用CPAP是可行的,且可能避免ETI的需要。未来需要进行对照研究,以评估院前CPAP系统的效用和成本效益。