Faddy S C, Garlick S R
Department of Cardiology, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Emerg Med J. 2005 Dec;22(12):901-8. doi: 10.1136/emj.2004.020891.
A safe and effective form of pain relief would be an advantage in the prehospital treatment of patients experiencing extreme pain. Although used by many emergency medical services, 50% nitrous oxide (an inhaled analgesic known to have good pain relief properties) is not widely used by volunteer and semiprofessional organisations. This review aimed to determine whether 50% nitrous oxide is safe for use by first responders who are not trained as emergency medical technicians. A thorough search of the literature identified 12 randomised controlled trials investigating the use of 50% nitrous oxide (as compared with placebo or conventional analgesic regimens) in a range of conditions. The outcomes analysed for this review were: adverse events, recovery time, and need for additional medication. None of the studies compared the treatments in the prehospital setting; children were well represented. Adverse effects were rare and significant adverse outcomes such as hypotension and oxygen desaturation could not be attributed to nitrous oxide. Compared with patients receiving conventional analgesia, those receiving 50% nitrous oxide did not require additional medication any more frequently and had a faster recovery from sedative effects. The low incidence of significant adverse events from 50% nitrous oxide suggests that this agent could be used safely by lay responders.
一种安全有效的疼痛缓解方式在院前治疗极度疼痛的患者时会是一项优势。尽管许多急救医疗服务机构都在使用,但50%一氧化二氮(一种已知具有良好止痛特性的吸入性镇痛药)并未被志愿者组织和半专业组织广泛使用。本综述旨在确定50%一氧化二氮对于未接受过急救医疗技术员培训的急救人员而言使用是否安全。对文献进行全面检索后,确定了12项随机对照试验,这些试验研究了在一系列情况下使用50%一氧化二氮(与安慰剂或传统镇痛方案相比)的情况。本次综述分析的结果包括:不良事件、恢复时间以及额外用药需求。没有一项研究在院前环境中比较这些治疗方法;儿童在研究中有充分的代表性。不良反应很少见,诸如低血压和氧饱和度降低等严重不良后果不能归因于一氧化二氮。与接受传统镇痛的患者相比,接受50%一氧化二氮治疗的患者并不更频繁地需要额外用药,并且从镇静作用中恢复得更快。50%一氧化二氮严重不良事件的低发生率表明,这种药物可以被非专业急救人员安全使用。