Suppr超能文献

美国、英国和爱尔兰苯丙酮尿症筛查效果的比较。

A comparison of effectiveness of screening for phenylketonuria in the United States, United Kingdom and Ireland.

作者信息

Starfield B, Holtzman N A

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 1975 Jul 17;293(3):118-21. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197507172930304.

Abstract

A study of the effectiveness of screening for phenylketonuria in the United Kingdom, Ireland, and the United States indicated that the diagnosis is more likely to be missed in the latter two countries because of the earlier age at which infants are screened. Furthermore, in the United States, diagnosis and treatment are delayed as compared with Ireland and the United Kingdom. Because test most commonly used to detect phenylketonuria is identical in all three countries, the differences in effectiveness are attributable to the way in which it is applied. In the United Kingdom, personnel and facilities have clearly defined roles and responsibilities. There is co-ordination between in-hospital and extra-hospital health care, and follow-up care of young infants in the community is assured. Greater effectiveness of screening in the United States will require a more rational organization of health services.

摘要

一项针对英国、爱尔兰和美国苯丙酮尿症筛查有效性的研究表明,由于后两个国家对婴儿进行筛查的年龄较早,因此更有可能漏诊。此外,与爱尔兰和英国相比,美国的诊断和治疗有所延迟。由于这三个国家用于检测苯丙酮尿症的最常用检测方法相同,有效性的差异归因于该检测方法的应用方式。在英国,人员和设施都有明确界定的角色和职责。医院内和医院外的医疗保健之间相互协调,社区中幼儿的后续护理也有保障。美国要提高筛查的有效性,需要对卫生服务进行更合理的组织。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验