Suppr超能文献

一项在预防性健康检查期间筛查成人听力损失的随机对照试验。

A randomised controlled trial of screening for adult hearing loss during preventive health checks.

作者信息

Karlsmose B, Lauritzen T, Engberg M, Parving A

机构信息

Department and Research Unit of General Practice, University of Aarhus, Vennelyst Boulevard 6, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.

出版信息

Br J Gen Pract. 2001 May;51(466):351-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prophylactic strategies to counter acquired hearing impairment may involve routine audiometric screening of asymptomatic working-age adults attending general practice for regular health checks.

AIM

To evaluate the effect of adult hearing screening on subsequent noise exposure and hearing.

DESIGN OF STUDY

A randomised controlled population-based study of health checks and health discussions in general practice.

SETTING

The project was initiated in the district of Ebeltoft, Aarhus county, Denmark.

METHOD

Intervention group participants' hearing thresholds were determined audiometrically at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 4 kHz in each ear. Participants were advised to get their ears checked if the average hearing loss exceeded 20 dB hearing level (dBHL) in either ear. Noise avoidance was emphasised when thresholds exceeded 25 dBHL bilaterally at 4 kHz. Follow-up included questionnaires and audiometry.

RESULTS

Hearing loss was observed among 18.9% of the study sample at baseline. At the five-year follow-up we recorded no significant differences between the control and the intervention groups regarding subjective or objective hearing, or exposure to occupational noise. However, there was a tendency towards reduction in exposure to leisure noise among intervention participants (P = 0.045). Approximately 20% reported hearing problems; 16.5% reported tinnitus-related complaints; 0.8% used hearing aids; 35.0% reported frequent noise exposure; and occluding wax was suspected in 2.1%.

CONCLUSION

Preventive health checks with audiometry did not significantly affect hearing, but leisure noise exposure tended to become less frequent. The poor effect may be ascribed to inadequate audiological counselling or a higher priority to other advice, e.g. on cardiovascular risk or lifestyle.

摘要

背景

预防后天性听力障碍的策略可能包括对参加常规健康检查的无症状工作年龄成年人进行常规听力筛查。

目的

评估成人听力筛查对后续噪声暴露和听力的影响。

研究设计

一项基于人群的关于普通医疗中健康检查和健康讨论的随机对照研究。

研究地点

该项目在丹麦奥胡斯郡埃贝勒夫特地区启动。

方法

干预组参与者每只耳朵在0.5、1、2、3和4千赫兹频率下通过听力测定确定听力阈值。如果任一只耳朵的平均听力损失超过20分贝听力级(dBHL),建议参与者检查耳朵。当4千赫兹频率下双侧阈值超过25 dBHL时,强调避免噪声。随访包括问卷调查和听力测定。

结果

在基线时,研究样本中有18.9%观察到听力损失。在五年随访中,我们记录到对照组和干预组在主观或客观听力、或职业噪声暴露方面没有显著差异。然而,干预组参与者的休闲噪声暴露有减少的趋势(P = 0.045)。约20%报告有听力问题;16.5%报告有耳鸣相关症状;0.8%使用助听器;35.0%报告经常暴露于噪声;2.1%怀疑有耵聍堵塞。

结论

听力测定的预防性健康检查对听力没有显著影响,但休闲噪声暴露往往变得不那么频繁。效果不佳可能归因于听力咨询不足或对其他建议(如心血管风险或生活方式方面的建议)给予了更高优先级。

相似文献

3
Hearing in nonprofessional pop/rock musicians.非专业流行/摇滚音乐家的听力情况。
Ear Hear. 2006 Aug;27(4):321-30. doi: 10.1097/01.aud.0000224737.34907.5e.

本文引用的文献

2
Audiometry in general practice: validation of a pragmatic pure-tone audiometry method.
Scand Audiol. 1998;27(3):137-42. doi: 10.1080/010503998422638.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验