Resnicow K, Wang T, Dudley W N, Jackson A, Ahluwalia J S, Baranowski T, Braithwaite R L
Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
J Urban Health. 2001 Mar;78(1):125-40. doi: 10.1093/jurban/78.1.125.
Because African Americans tend to have lower socioeconomic status (SES) than whites and numerous health indicators are related to SES variables, it is important when examining between-group differences in health indices to account for SES differences. This study examined the effects of income and education on several biologic and behavioral risk factors in a sample of sociodemographically diverse African American adults. Approximately 1,000 African American adults (aged 18-87) were recruited from 14 churches with predominantly black membership to participate in a nutrition education intervention. Demographics, height, weight, blood pressure, self-reported cigarette and alcohol use, self-reported diet by food frequency questionnaire, serum carotenoids, serum total cholesterol, and nutrition knowledge were assessed. The association of these risk factors were examined by four levels of education and income. For men, body mass index, blood pressure, total cholesterol, daily intake of fruits and vegetables, serum carotenoids, heavy alcohol use, or exercise were not associated significantly with income or education using analysis of variance (ANOVA). Past month alcohol use and nutrition knowledge were associated positively with education, but not income. For women, body mass index and smoking were associated inversely with income, but not with education. Blood pressure, total cholesterol, intake of fruits and vegetables, heavy alcohol use, and exercise were not associated with either income or education using ANOVA. Serum carotenoids, any 30-day alcohol use, and nutrition knowledge were associated positively with both income and education. Results using linear regression generally were similar for men and women, although a few more variables were associated significantly with SES compared to ANOVA analyses. Several health indicators that have been associated with socioeconomic variables in whites were not associated or only weakly associated in this diverse sample of African Americans. One interpretation of these findings is that SES factors may function differently among blacks and whites.
由于非裔美国人的社会经济地位(SES)往往低于白人,且众多健康指标与SES变量相关,因此在研究健康指数的组间差异时,考虑SES差异非常重要。本研究在社会人口统计学特征多样的非裔美国成年人样本中,考察了收入和教育对几种生物和行为风险因素的影响。从14个主要由黑人成员组成的教堂招募了约1000名非裔美国成年人(年龄在18 - 87岁之间),参与一项营养教育干预。评估了人口统计学特征、身高、体重、血压、自我报告的吸烟和饮酒情况、通过食物频率问卷自我报告的饮食、血清类胡萝卜素、血清总胆固醇以及营养知识。通过教育和收入的四个水平考察了这些风险因素之间的关联。对于男性,使用方差分析(ANOVA)时,体重指数、血压、总胆固醇、水果和蔬菜的每日摄入量、血清类胡萝卜素、大量饮酒或运动与收入或教育均无显著关联。过去一个月的饮酒情况和营养知识与教育呈正相关,但与收入无关。对于女性,体重指数和吸烟与收入呈负相关,但与教育无关。使用ANOVA时,血压、总胆固醇、水果和蔬菜的摄入量、大量饮酒和运动与收入或教育均无关联。血清类胡萝卜素、任何30天的饮酒情况和营养知识与收入和教育均呈正相关。尽管与ANOVA分析相比,使用线性回归时与SES显著相关的变量更多一些,但男性和女性的结果总体上相似。在白人中与社会经济变量相关的几个健康指标,在这个多样化的非裔美国人样本中要么不相关,要么仅呈微弱相关。这些发现的一种解释是,SES因素在黑人和白人中的作用可能不同。