Ninane V, Leduc D, Kafi S A, Nasser M, Houa M, Sergysels R
Chest, Neurology, and Intensive Care Services, Saint-Pierre University Hospital, Rue Haute, 300, 1000 Brussels, Belgium.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001 May;163(6):1326-30. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.163.6.2004150.
We have assessed a new method, manual compression of the abdominal wall (MCA) during expiration, in the detection of expiratory flow limitation. Twelve stable patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and five normal subjects were studied during spontaneous breathing in the supine and seated posture. MCA was performed during expiration with one hand at the umbilical level and we measured flow, volume, pleural (Ppl) and gastric (Pga) pressures and abdominal anteroposterior (AP) diameter at the umbilical level with magnetometers. No increase in expiratory flow during MCA relative to the preceding breath despite associated increases in pressures was considered as indicating expiratory flow limitation. In seven additional patients with increased upper airway collapsibility (obstructive sleep apnea syndrome [OSAS]), MCA was compared with negative expiratory pressure (NEP). In normal seated subjects, MCA was associated with a decrease in abdominal AP dimension (mean +/- SD: -27 +/- 6%), an increase in Pga (14.7 +/- 7.4 cm H(2)O) and Ppl (6.2 +/- 2.2 cm H(2)O), and an increase in expiratory flow. MCA caused similar changes in abdominal AP dimension and pressures in seated patients with COPD but six of them (50%), including four patients with FEV(1) less than 1 L, had no increase in expiratory flow. In the supine posture, MCA always increased expiratory flow in normal subjects but four additional patients with COPD showed evidence of flow limitation. MCA invariably increased expiratory flow in patients with OSAS whereas the NEP method suggested flow limitation in some cases. We conclude that MCA is a very simple method that allows detection of flow limitation in different positions.
我们评估了一种新方法,即在呼气时手动按压腹壁(MCA),用于检测呼气气流受限情况。对12例稳定期慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者和5名正常受试者在仰卧位和坐位自主呼吸期间进行了研究。在呼气时于脐水平用一只手进行MCA操作,并用磁力计测量气流、容积、胸膜压力(Ppl)和胃内压力(Pga)以及脐水平的腹部前后径(AP)。尽管压力相关增加,但MCA期间呼气气流相对于前一次呼吸未增加被认为提示呼气气流受限。在另外7例上气道可塌陷性增加的患者(阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征[OSAS])中,将MCA与呼气负压(NEP)进行了比较。在正常坐位受试者中,MCA与腹部AP维度减小(平均值±标准差:-27±6%)、Pga升高(14.7±7.4 cmH₂O)和Ppl升高(6.2±2.2 cmH₂O)以及呼气气流增加有关。MCA在坐位COPD患者中引起类似的腹部AP维度和压力变化,但其中6例(50%),包括4例第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV₁)小于1L的患者,呼气气流未增加。在仰卧位时,MCA在正常受试者中总是增加呼气气流,但另外4例COPD患者显示有气流受限的证据。MCA在OSAS患者中总是增加呼气气流,而NEP方法在某些情况下提示气流受限。我们得出结论,MCA是一种非常简单的方法,可用于检测不同体位下的气流受限情况。