Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Calmette Hospital, Lille II University Hospital, Lille 59000, France.
J Crit Care. 2012 Feb;27(1):37-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2011.05.011. Epub 2011 Jul 27.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the manual compression of the abdomen (MCA) during expiration as a simple bedside method to detect expiratory flow limitation (EFL) during daily clinical practice of mechanical ventilation (MV).
We studied 44 semirecumbent intubated and sedated critically ill patients. Flow-volume loops obtained during MCA were superimposed upon the preceding breaths and recorded with the ventilator. Expiratory flow limitation was expressed as percentage of expiratory tidal volume without any increase in flow during MCA (MCA [%V(T)]). In the first 13 patients, MCA was validated by comparison with the negative expiratory pressure (NEP) technique. Esophageal pressure changes during MCA and intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure were also recorded in all the patients.
Manual compression of the abdomen and NEP agreed in all cases in detecting EFL with a bias of -0.16%. Percentage of expiratory tidal volume without any increase in flow during MCA is highly correlated with percentage of expiratory tidal volume without any increase in flow during NEP (n = 13, P < .0001, r(2) = 0.99) and intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (n = 44, P < .001, r(2) = 0.78), with a good repeatability (n = 44; within-subject SD, 5.7%) and reproducibility (n = 13; within-subject SD, 2.41%). Two third of the patients were flow limited, among whom one third had no previously known respiratory disease.
Manual compression of the abdomen provides a simple, rapid, and safe bedside reliable maneuver to detect and quantify EFL during mechanical ventilation.
本研究旨在评估呼气时手动压迫腹部(MCA)作为一种简单的床边方法,以在机械通气(MV)的日常临床实践中检测呼气流量受限(EFL)。
我们研究了 44 名半卧位插管和镇静的重症患者。在 MCA 期间获得的流量-容积环与前一次呼吸叠加,并由呼吸机记录。在 MCA 期间没有流量增加的情况下,呼气末流量受限表示为呼气潮气量的百分比(MCA [%V(T)])。在最初的 13 例患者中,通过与负呼气压力(NEP)技术进行比较来验证 MCA。在所有患者中还记录了 MCA 期间食管压力变化和固有正呼气末压。
在所有情况下,手动压迫腹部和 NEP 均在检测 EFL 方面达成一致,存在 -0.16%的偏差。在 MCA 期间没有任何流量增加的情况下,呼气潮气量的百分比与在 NEP 期间没有任何流量增加的情况下呼气潮气量的百分比高度相关(n = 13,P <.0001,r² = 0.99)和固有正呼气末压(n = 44,P <.001,r² = 0.78),具有良好的可重复性(n = 44;个体内标准差,5.7%)和再现性(n = 13;个体内标准差,2.41%)。三分之二的患者存在流量受限,其中三分之一患者之前没有已知的呼吸系统疾病。
手动压迫腹部提供了一种简单、快速且安全的床边可靠方法,可用于检测和量化机械通气期间的 EFL。