Suppr超能文献

稳定期哮喘患者静息呼吸时的呼气气流受限

Expiratory flow limitation in stable asthmatic patients during resting breathing.

作者信息

Boczkowski J, Murciano D, Pichot M H, Ferretti A, Pariente R, Milic-Emili J

机构信息

INSERM U408, Service de Pneumologie, Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France.

出版信息

Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997 Sep;156(3 Pt 1):752-7. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.156.3.9609083.

Abstract

Application of negative pressure at the mouth during tidal expiration (NEP) provides a simple, rapid, noninvasive method for detecting expiratory flow limitation during spontaneous breathing. Patients in whom NEP elicits an increase in flow throughout expiration are not flow-limited (FL). In contrast, patients in whom application of NEP does not elicit an increase in flow during most or part of tidal expiration are considered FL. We have used the NEP technique to assess the prevalence of expiratory flow limitation during resting breathing in sable asthmatic patients in both the seated and supine positions. In patients in the sitting position, we have also assessed flow limitation with the conventional method, based on comparison of tidal and maximal expiratory flow-volume (MEFV) curves. We studied 13 patients (FEV1 range: 48 to 94% predicted) with both the NEP and conventional techniques. According to the NEP technique, none of the patients was FL in the seated and only two were FL in the supine position. By contrast, on the basis of the conventional method, six of the patients would have been classified as FL in the sitting position. We conclude that: (1) most stable asthmatic patients do not exhibit tidal expiratory flow limitation during resting breathing; and (2) the conventional method for assessing flow limitation may lead to erroneous conclusions.

摘要

在呼气潮气量时在口腔施加负压(NEP)提供了一种简单、快速、无创的方法来检测自主呼吸过程中的呼气气流受限情况。在整个呼气过程中NEP能引起气流增加的患者不存在气流受限(FL)。相反,在呼气潮气量的大部分或部分过程中施加NEP不能引起气流增加的患者被认为存在气流受限。我们使用NEP技术评估了黑貂色哮喘患者在静息呼吸时坐位和仰卧位的呼气气流受限患病率。对于坐位患者,我们还基于潮气和最大呼气流量-容积(MEFV)曲线的比较,用传统方法评估了气流受限情况。我们用NEP和传统技术研究了13例患者(FEV1范围:预测值的48%至94%)。根据NEP技术,坐位时没有患者存在气流受限,仰卧位时只有2例存在气流受限。相比之下,基于传统方法,坐位时有6例患者会被归类为气流受限。我们得出结论:(1)大多数稳定期哮喘患者在静息呼吸时不存在呼气潮气量气流受限;(2)评估气流受限的传统方法可能会导致错误结论。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验