Johnson S D, Tamney J B
Department of Sociology, Ball State University, Muncie, IN 47306, USA.
J Soc Psychol. 2001 Apr;141(2):233-43. doi: 10.1080/00224540109600549.
The authors surveyed by telephone a random sample of voters in the 1996 presidential election from the Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area of Muncie, IN ("Middletown"; R. Lynd & H. Lynd, 1929) to test a model describing the nature of 2 conservative political ideologies--social traditionalism and economic conservatism. The model, based on functions of attitudes theory, predicted (a) that the 2 political ideologies would appeal to 2 rather distinct constituency groups--the former, to conservative Protestants; the latter, to people of higher incomes--and (b) that social traditionalists would be more dogmatic and economic conservatives would be more open-minded in their respective views. The findings were consistent with those predictions.
作者通过电话对来自印第安纳州曼西标准大都市统计区(“米德尔敦”;R. 林德和H. 林德,1929年)的1996年总统选举选民随机样本进行了调查,以检验一个描述两种保守政治意识形态——社会传统主义和经济保守主义本质的模型。该模型基于态度理论的函数,预测:(a)这两种政治意识形态将吸引两个相当不同的选民群体——前者吸引保守的新教徒;后者吸引高收入人群;(b)社会传统主义者在各自观点上会更教条,而经济保守主义者会更开明。研究结果与这些预测一致。