Hazelgrove J F, Price C, Pappachan V J, Smith G B
Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, UK.
Crit Care Med. 2001 Apr;29(4):770-5. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200104000-00016.
To identify pregnant and postpartum patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs), the cause for their admission, and the proportion that might be appropriately managed in a high-dependency environment (HDU) by using an existing database. To estimate the goodness-of-fit for the Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II, and the APACHE III scoring systems in the obstetrical population.
Retrospective analysis of demographic, diagnostic, treatment, and severity of illness data.
Fourteen ICUs in Southern England.
Pregnant or postpartum (<42 days) admissions between January 1, 1994, and December 31, 1996.
None.
We identified 210 patients, constituting 1.84% (210 of 11,385) of all ICU admissions and 0.17% (210 of 122,850) of all deliveries. Most admissions followed postpartum complications (hypertensive disease of pregnancy [39.5%] and major hemorrhage [33.3%]). Seven women were transferred to specialist ICUs. There was considerable variation between ICUs with respect to the number and type of interventions required by patients. Some 35.7% of patients stayed in ICU for <2 days and received no specific ICU interventions; these patients might have been safely managed in an HDU. There were seven maternal deaths (3.3%); fetal mortality rate was 20%. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve and the standardized mortality ratio were 0.92 (confidence interval [CI], 0.85-0.99) and 0.43 for the Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, 0.94 (CI, 0.86-1.0) and 0.24 for APACHE II, and 0.98 (CI, 0.96-1.0) and 0.43 for APACHE III, respectively.
Existing databases can both identify critically ill obstetrical patients and provide important information about them. Obstetrical ICU admissions often require minimal intervention and are associated with low mortality rates. Many might be more appropriately managed in an HDU. The commonly used severity of illness scoring systems are good discriminators of outcome from intensive care admission in this group but may overestimate mortality rates. Severity of illness scoring systems may require modification in obstetrical patients to adjust for the normal physiologic responses to pregnancy.
利用现有数据库确定入住重症监护病房(ICU)的孕妇及产后患者、其入住原因以及在高依赖环境(HDU)中可能得到妥善管理的比例。评估简化急性生理学评分II(Simplified Acute Physiology Score II)、急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估(Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation,APACHE)II及APACHE III评分系统在产科人群中的拟合优度。
对人口统计学、诊断、治疗及疾病严重程度数据进行回顾性分析。
英格兰南部的14个ICU。
1994年1月1日至1996年12月31日期间入住的孕妇或产后(<42天)患者
无。
我们确定了210例患者,占所有ICU入院患者的1.84%(11385例中的210例)及所有分娩患者的0.17%(122850例中的210例)。大多数患者是产后并发症入院(妊娠高血压疾病[39.5%]和大出血[33.3%])。7名女性被转至专科ICU病房。不同ICU之间,患者所需干预措施的数量和类型存在很大差异。约35.7%的患者在ICU停留<2天,未接受特定的ICU干预;这些患者或许可在HDU中得到安全管理。有7例孕产妇死亡(3.3%);胎儿死亡率为20%。简化急性生理学评分II系统的受试者工作特征曲线下面积及标准化死亡率分别为0.92(置信区间[CI],0.85 - 0.99)及0.43;APACHE II系统分别为0.94(CI,0.86 - 1.0)及0.24;APACHE III系统分别为0.98(CI,0.96 - 1.0)及0.43。
现有数据库既能识别重症产科患者,又能提供有关他们的重要信息。产科ICU入院患者通常只需极少干预,且死亡率较低。许多患者或许在HDU中能得到更妥善的管理。常用的疾病严重程度评分系统能很好地区分该组患者重症监护入院后的预后,但可能高估死亡率。疾病严重程度评分系统可能需要针对产科患者进行调整,以适应孕期正常的生理反应。