Suppr超能文献

妊娠期重症监护病房入院情况:支持水平评分系统分析

Intensive Care Admissions in Pregnancy: Analysis of a Level of Support Scoring System.

作者信息

Thakur Mili, Gonik Bernard, Gill Navleen, Awonuga Awoniyi O, Rocha Frederico G, Gonzalez Juan M

机构信息

Division of Genetic and Metabolic Disorders, Department of Pediatrics and Center for Molecular Medicine and Genetics, Wayne State University/Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wayne State University/Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI, USA.

出版信息

Matern Child Health J. 2016 Jan;20(1):106-113. doi: 10.1007/s10995-015-1808-9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Development of a validated triaging system that can be used by obstetric providers to identify obstetric patients at risk of developing severe morbidity during an admission is urgently required. Maternal Critical Care Working Group (MCCWG) recommended a "level of care" strategy that based patient acuity needs on number of individual organ systems requiring support. The objective of this study was to apply the MCCWG level of support for critical care (MCCWG LOC) scoring to pregnant women admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) to predict maternal outcomes and to compare it to the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scoring system.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we applied the MCCWG LOC scoring to pregnant women admitted to an ICU at the Detroit Medical Center, between January 2006 and December 2010. The MCCWG LOC was scored on admission to the ICU, and patients were subsequently divided into two groups (Group 1, patients requiring Level 1 and 2 support and Group 2, patients requiring level 3a and 3b support) and their outcome variables were compared. The MCCWG LOC scores were also compared to APACHE II scoring, an ICU scoring system, to test if an alignment of the two systems existed, and if they were able to predict outcomes such as death, hospital and intensive care stay.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine pregnant women (0.25% of deliveries) required admission to the ICU and 3 maternal deaths were reported. Sixty-four (92.7%) patients had pre-existing medical problems. Fifty-eight (84%) of admissions were secondary to a medical diagnosis. Mean APACHE II score (p < 0.018) and APACHE II predicted mortality rate were significantly higher in Group 2 (p < 0.018). The hospital length of stay (LOS) (p < 0.017) and ICU LOS (p < 0.0001) were significantly longer in Group 2 as compared to Group 1. Group 2 patients required more interventions while in the ICU (p < 0.0001). All the patients who died were classified as Group 2.

CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE

In a cohort of women requiring intensive care admission during pregnancy, MCCWG LOC, a simplified organ system based, triaging scoring system, predicted maternal outcomes and correlated with APACHE II score. Our data support initiatives for further development and testing of global obstetric triaging scoring systems for the purposes of risk stratification, monitoring of quality and resource allocation.

摘要

目的

迫切需要开发一种经过验证的分诊系统,供产科医护人员用于识别入院期间有发生严重并发症风险的产科患者。孕产妇重症监护工作组(MCCWG)推荐了一种“护理级别”策略,该策略根据需要支持的单个器官系统数量来确定患者的急性护理需求。本研究的目的是将MCCWG重症监护支持级别(MCCWG LOC)评分应用于入住重症监护病房(ICU)的孕妇,以预测孕产妇结局,并将其与急性生理与慢性健康状况评估(APACHE)II评分系统进行比较。

方法

在这项回顾性研究中,我们将MCCWG LOC评分应用于2006年1月至2010年12月期间入住底特律医疗中心ICU的孕妇。在入住ICU时对MCCWG LOC进行评分,随后将患者分为两组(第1组,需要1级和2级支持的患者;第2组,需要3a级和3b级支持的患者),并比较她们的结局变量。还将MCCWG LOC评分与ICU评分系统APACHE II评分进行比较,以测试这两个系统是否一致,以及它们是否能够预测死亡、住院和重症监护停留等结局。

结果

69名孕妇(占分娩总数的0.25%)需要入住ICU,报告有3例孕产妇死亡。64名(92.7%)患者有既往病史。58例(84%)入院是由医疗诊断引起的。第2组的平均APACHE II评分(p < 0.018)和APACHE II预测死亡率显著更高(p < 0.018)。与第1组相比,第2组的住院时间(LOS)(p < 0.017)和ICU住院时间(p < 0.0001)显著更长。第2组患者在ICU期间需要更多的干预措施(p < 0.0001)。所有死亡患者均被归类为第2组。

实践结论

在一组孕期需要入住重症监护病房的女性中,MCCWG LOC是一种基于器官系统的简化分诊评分系统,可预测孕产妇结局并与APACHE II评分相关。我们的数据支持为风险分层、质量监测和资源分配目的进一步开发和测试全球产科分诊评分系统的倡议。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验