Suppr超能文献

一种用于检测甜菜坏死黄脉病毒的高灵敏度巢式逆转录聚合酶链反应方法的开发。

Development of a highly sensitive nested RT-PCR method for Beet necrotic yellow vein virus detection.

作者信息

Morris J, Clover G R, Harju V A, Hugo S A, Henry C M

机构信息

Central Science Laboratory, MAFF, Sand Hutton, YO41 1LZ, York, UK.

出版信息

J Virol Methods. 2001 Jun;95(1-2):163-9. doi: 10.1016/s0166-0934(01)00308-1.

Abstract

A diagnostic test incorporating reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and nested polymerase chain reaction (nPCR) was developed for the detection of Beet necrotic yellow vein virus (BNYVV). The RT-PCR used the primers designed by (Henry et al., J. Virol. Methods 54 (1995)15) but refinements were made to the protocol including simplification of the extraction method, the use of standard reagents and adoption of a one-step procedure. None of these changes impaired sensitivity or specificity. The RT-PCR could also be used to amplify immunocaptured virus but this was slightly less sensitive than amplification from purified RNA. In nPCR, a second round of amplification was performed using primers, which produce a specific 326 base-pair product. Both RT-PCR and nPCR detected a range of 21 isolates collected from Europe, America and Asia (including A, B and P pathotypes) isolated from either sugar beet or Chenopodium quinoa. Neither assay produced PCR products using total RNA extracted from the roots of healthy sugar beet or beet infected with Beet soil-borne virus. However, the sensitivity of the nPCR was 1000 times greater than the standard RT-PCR. The reliability of the standard RT-PCR and nPCR was demonstrated using a range of cultivars collected from an infected field site. The use of the nPCR assay is recommended for applications where its improved sensitivity over standard RT-PCR is necessary, for example in the early detection of infection from bait-test soils and for quarantine and breeding purposes.

摘要

开发了一种结合逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)和巢式聚合酶链反应(nPCR)的诊断测试方法,用于检测甜菜坏死黄脉病毒(BNYVV)。RT-PCR使用了(亨利等人,《病毒学方法杂志》54(1995)15)设计的引物,但对方案进行了改进,包括简化提取方法、使用标准试剂和采用一步法。这些改变均未损害敏感性或特异性。RT-PCR也可用于扩增免疫捕获的病毒,但这比从纯化RNA扩增的敏感性略低。在nPCR中,使用产生特定326个碱基对产物的引物进行第二轮扩增。RT-PCR和nPCR均检测到从欧洲、美洲和亚洲收集的21种分离株(包括A、B和P致病型),这些分离株从甜菜或藜麦中分离得到。两种检测方法使用从健康甜菜根或感染甜菜土壤传播病毒的甜菜根中提取的总RNA均未产生PCR产物。然而,nPCR的敏感性比标准RT-PCR高1000倍。使用从感染田间地点收集的一系列品种证明了标准RT-PCR和nPCR的可靠性。对于需要比标准RT-PCR更高敏感性的应用,例如从诱饵测试土壤中早期检测感染以及用于检疫和育种目的,建议使用nPCR检测方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验