Hashimoto S, Shirato H, Nishioka T, Kagei K, Shimizu S, Fujita K, Ogasawara H, Watanabe Y, Miyasaka K
Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001 Jun 1;50(2):579-85. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(01)01485-7.
To use digitally reconstructed radiography (DRR) and digitally compressed portal images in distant consultation using a telecommunications network, the verification performance of DRR and digitally compressed portal images on the image console was investigated.
A human thoracic phantom was scanned with computed tomography (CT). Radiotherapy was planned at 5 different anatomic locations. A digitally reconstructed radiograph was made; verification films of the phantom were then taken with 6-MV X-rays. The treatment center was intentionally dislocated. Fifty sets of DRR and portal images were seen by 7 doctors on a conventional view-box (view-box method) to judge whether the treatment center was dislocated. These image sets were digitalized by a film scanner, compressed to 1/10 Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) format, and compared on an image console by the same physicians (image-console method). The verification performance of the image console method was compared with that of the view-box method by means of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Clinically, 159 portal-image-sets were verified with the image-console method and the appropriateness of the decision was later assessed by the view-box method.
The accuracy of the treatment verification was estimated to be 88.8% by the conventional view-box method and 88.3% by the image-console method. There was no statistically significant difference in the verification performances of the conventional method (Az = 0.86+/-0.02) and the image console method (Az = 0.84+/-0.07). Frequent digital image-processing modification was positively related to the accuracy of verification. Clinically, there were 3 (1.8%) major corrections, 31 (19.5%) minor corrections, and 123 cases with no correction. No further correction was called for by the re-evaluation using the view-box method.
The verification performance of DRR and digitally compressed portal images on the image console was as accurate as the conventional method. Distant consultation using DRR and portal images through telecommunication is usable in clinical practice.
为了在远程会诊中使用数字重建X线摄影(DRR)和数字压缩的射野影像通过电信网络进行研究,我们对DRR和数字压缩的射野影像在影像控制台的验证性能进行了调查。
使用计算机断层扫描(CT)对人体胸部模型进行扫描。在5个不同的解剖位置进行放射治疗计划。制作数字重建X线片;然后用6兆伏X射线拍摄模型的验证片。故意使治疗中心移位。7名医生在传统观片灯上查看50组DRR和射野影像(观片灯法),以判断治疗中心是否移位。这些影像组通过胶片扫描仪数字化,压缩为1/10联合图像专家组(JPEG)格式,并由相同的医生在影像控制台上进行比较(影像控制台法)。通过接收者操作特征(ROC)分析将影像控制台法的验证性能与观片灯法进行比较。临床上,使用影像控制台法对159组射野影像进行了验证,随后通过观片灯法评估决策的适当性。
传统观片灯法估计治疗验证的准确率为88.8%,影像控制台法为88.3%。传统方法(Az = 0.86±0.02)和影像控制台法(Az = 0.84±0.07)的验证性能在统计学上没有显著差异。频繁的数字图像处理修改与验证的准确性呈正相关。临床上,有3例(1.8%)进行了重大校正,31例(19.5%)进行了轻微校正,123例未进行校正。使用观片灯法重新评估后无需进一步校正。
DRR和数字压缩的射野影像在影像控制台上的验证性能与传统方法一样准确。通过电信使用DRR和射野影像进行远程会诊在临床实践中是可行的。