Edelmann W, Schleiss K, Joss A
Arbeitsgemeinschaft Bioenergie, CH-8933 Maschwanden, Switzerland. www.biogas.ch/arbi
Water Sci Technol. 2000;41(3):263-73.
In order to get more detailed information for better decision making in future biogenic waste treatment, different processes to treat biogenic wastes in plants with a treating capacity of 10,000 tons of organic household wastes per year were compared. The comparison included life cycle assessments as well as economic considerations for different treating methods. Measurements on compost plants showed that methane emissions are higher than estimated so far. With the tools ECOINDICATOR and UBP anaerobic digestion shows to be advantageous as compared to composting, incineration or combination of digestion and composting, mainly because of a better energy balance. In fully enclosed, professional treatment plants, the specific biotechnological treatment costs are in the range of about 150.-sFr/ton for aerobic, anaerobic and combined technologies. It can be concluded, that anaerobic processes will become considerably more important in the future mainly for ecological reasons.
为了获取更详细的信息,以便在未来的生物垃圾处理中做出更好的决策,对每年处理10000吨有机生活垃圾的工厂中处理生物垃圾的不同工艺进行了比较。比较内容包括生命周期评估以及不同处理方法的经济考量。堆肥厂的测量结果表明,甲烷排放量比迄今为止估计的要高。使用ECOINDICATOR和UBP工具进行评估显示,与堆肥、焚烧或消化与堆肥相结合的方法相比,厌氧消化具有优势,这主要是因为其能量平衡更好。在全封闭的专业处理厂中,好氧、厌氧和联合技术的特定生物技术处理成本约为150瑞士法郎/吨。可以得出结论,主要出于生态原因,厌氧工艺在未来将变得更加重要。