Suppr超能文献

重温发热恐惧症:二十年来父母对发热的误解有变化吗?

Fever phobia revisited: have parental misconceptions about fever changed in 20 years?

作者信息

Crocetti M, Moghbeli N, Serwint J

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 2001 Jun;107(6):1241-6. doi: 10.1542/peds.107.6.1241.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Fever is one of the most common reasons that parents seek medical attention for their children. Parental concerns arise in part because of the belief that fever is a disease rather than a symptom or sign of illness. Twenty years ago, Barton Schmitt, MD, found that parents had numerous misconceptions about fever. These unrealistic concerns were termed "fever phobia." More recent concerns for occult bacteremia in febrile children have led to more aggressive laboratory testing and treatment. Our objectives for this study were to explore current parental attitudes toward fever, to compare these attitudes with those described by Schmitt in 1980, and to determine whether recent, more aggressive laboratory testing and presumptive treatment for occult bacteremia is associated with increased parental concern regarding fever.

METHODS

Between June and September 1999, a single research assistant administered a cross-sectional 29-item questionnaire to caregivers whose children were enrolled in 2 urban hospital-based pediatric clinics in Baltimore, Maryland. The questionnaire was administered before either health maintenance or acute care visits at both sites. Portions of the questionnaire were modeled after Schmitt's and elicited information about definition of fever, concerns about fever, and fever management. Additional information included home fever reduction techniques, frequency of temperature monitoring, and parental recall of past laboratory workup and treatment that these children had received during health care visits for fever.

RESULTS

A total of 340 caregivers were interviewed. Fifty-six percent of caregivers were very worried about the potential harm of fever in their children, 44% considered a temperature of 38.9 degrees C (102 degrees F) to be a "high" fever, and 7% thought that a temperature could rise to >/=43.4 degrees C (>/=110 degrees F) if left untreated. Ninety-one percent of caregivers believed that a fever could cause harmful effects; 21% listed brain damage, and 14% listed death. Strikingly, 52% of caregivers said that they would check their child's temperature </=1 hour when their child had a fever, 25% gave antipyretics for temperatures <37.8 degrees C (<100 degrees F), and 85% would awaken their child to give antipyretics. Fourteen percent of caregivers gave acetaminophen, and 44% gave ibuprofen at too frequent dosing intervals. Of the 73% of caregivers who said that they sponged their child to treat a fever, 24% sponged at temperatures </=37.8 degrees C (</=100 degrees F); 18% used alcohol. Forty-six percent of caregivers listed doctors as their primary resource for information about fever. Caregivers who stated that they were very worried about fever were more likely in the past to have had a child who was evaluated for a fever, to have had blood work performed on their child during a febrile illness, and to have perceived their doctors to be very worried about fever. Compared with 20 years ago, more caregivers listed seizure as a potential harm of fever, woke their children and checked temperatures more often during febrile illnesses, and gave antipyretics or initiated sponging more frequently for possible normal temperatures.

CONCLUSIONS

Fever phobia persists. Pediatric health care providers have a unique opportunity to make an impact on parental understanding of fever and its role in illness. Future studies are needed to evaluate educational interventions and to identify the types of medical care practices that foster fever phobia.fever, fever phobia, child, children, antipyretics, sponging, health care practices.

摘要

目的

发热是家长带孩子就医最常见的原因之一。家长之所以担心,部分原因在于他们认为发热是一种疾病,而非疾病的症状或体征。20年前,医学博士巴顿·施密特发现家长对发热存在诸多误解。这些不切实际的担忧被称为“发热恐惧症”。近期对发热儿童潜在菌血症的担忧导致了更积极的实验室检查和治疗。我们开展这项研究的目的是探究当前家长对发热的态度,将这些态度与施密特在1980年所描述的态度进行比较,并确定近期针对潜在菌血症更积极的实验室检查和推定治疗是否与家长对发热的担忧增加有关。

方法

1999年6月至9月期间,一名研究助理向在马里兰州巴尔的摩市两家城市医院儿科诊所就诊的患儿家长发放了一份包含29个条目的横断面调查问卷。该问卷在两家诊所的健康维护或急性护理就诊前发放。问卷的部分内容以施密特的问卷为蓝本,收集了有关发热定义、对发热的担忧以及发热处理的信息。其他信息包括家庭退热方法、体温监测频率,以及家长回忆孩子在因发热就诊时过去接受的实验室检查和治疗情况。

结果

共访谈了340名家长。56%的家长非常担心发热对孩子的潜在危害,44%的家长认为体温38.9摄氏度(102华氏度)属于“高热”,7%的家长认为如果不治疗体温可能升至≥43.4摄氏度(≥110华氏度)。91%的家长认为发热会产生有害影响;21%的家长提到会导致脑损伤,14%的家长提到会导致死亡。令人惊讶的是,52%的家长表示孩子发热时他们会在≤1小时内给孩子测体温,25%的家长在体温<37.8摄氏度(<100华氏度)时就给孩子服用退烧药,85%的家长会叫醒孩子喂退烧药。14%的家长给孩子服用对乙酰氨基酚,44%的家长给孩子服用布洛芬的频率过高。在表示会给孩子擦身退热的73%的家长中,24%在体温≤37.8摄氏度(≤100华氏度)时就给孩子擦身;18%的家长使用酒精擦身。46%的家长将医生列为获取发热相关信息的主要来源。表示非常担心发热的家长过去更有可能让孩子接受过发热评估、在孩子发热疾病期间给孩子做过血液检查,并且认为医生也非常担心发热。与20年前相比,更多的家长将惊厥列为发热的潜在危害,在孩子发热疾病期间更频繁地叫醒孩子并测量体温,并且在体温可能正常时更频繁地给孩子服用退烧药或开始擦身。

结论

发热恐惧症仍然存在。儿科医疗服务提供者有独特的机会影响家长对发热及其在疾病中作用的理解。未来需要开展研究来评估教育干预措施,并确定助长发热恐惧症的医疗护理行为类型。发热、发热恐惧症、儿童、患儿、退烧药、擦身、医疗护理行为

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验