• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对父母发烧处理方式的影响:观念、经历及信息来源

Influences on parents' fever management: beliefs, experiences and information sources.

作者信息

Walsh Anne, Edwards Helen, Fraser Jenny

机构信息

School of Nursing, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.

出版信息

J Clin Nurs. 2007 Dec;16(12):2331-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01890.x. Epub 2007 Apr 5.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01890.x
PMID:17419783
Abstract

AIM

To identify parents' knowledge, beliefs, management and sources of information about fever management.

BACKGROUND

Despite numerous studies exploring parents' management of childhood fever; negative beliefs about fever and overuse of antipyretics and health services for mild fevers and self-limiting viral illnesses continue to be reported.

DESIGN

Qualitative design using semi-structured interviews and discussions.

METHOD

Fifteen metropolitan parents whose children were aged six months to five years, volunteered to participate in individual interviews or group discussions. Recruitment was through Playgroup Queensland's online newsletter and letters from two childcare centres to all parents. Verbatim and audio data were collected by an experienced moderator using a semi-structured interview guide.

DATA ANALYSIS

Two transcripts were independently analysed by two researchers; categories, sub-headings and codes were independently developed, crosschecked and found comparable. Remaining transcripts were analysed using developed categories and codes.

RESULTS

Fever, determined through behavioural changes, was perceived as 'good', a warning that something was wrong. High fever, reported as 38.0-39.1 degrees C, was considered harmful; it must be prevented or reduced irrespective of concerns about antipyretics. Positive febrile experiences reduced concern about fever. Negative experiences such as febrile convulsions, media reports of harm, not receiving a definitive diagnosis, inaccessibility to regular doctors and receiving conflicting information about fever management increased the concerns. Parents seek information about fever from multiple sources such as doctors, books and other parents.

CONCLUSIONS

Parents' experiences with and information sources about fever and fever management influenced their knowledge, beliefs and practices. Positive experiences reduce concerns, health service usage and sometimes antipyretic usage. Negative experiences increase concerns, monitoring and antipyretic and health service usage.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Health professionals need to update their fever management knowledge ensuring that it is based on the latest scientific knowledge. They must provide parents of young children with consistent, reliable information preferably before their first child's first febrile episode.

摘要

目的

确定家长关于发热管理的知识、观念、处理方式及信息来源。

背景

尽管有大量研究探讨家长对儿童发热的处理;但仍有报道称,家长对发热存在负面观念,且对于轻度发热和自限性病毒疾病过度使用退烧药及医疗服务。

设计

采用半结构式访谈和讨论的定性设计。

方法

15位居住在大城市、孩子年龄在6个月至5岁的家长自愿参与个人访谈或小组讨论。通过昆士兰亲子游戏小组的在线时事通讯以及两家儿童保育中心给所有家长的信件进行招募。由一位经验丰富的主持人使用半结构式访谈指南收集逐字记录和音频数据。

数据分析

两位研究人员独立分析两份访谈记录;独立制定类别、副标题和编码,交叉核对并发现具有可比性。其余访谈记录使用已制定的类别和编码进行分析。

结果

通过行为变化确定的发热被视为“有益的”,是身体出现问题的警示信号。体温在38.0 - 39.1摄氏度的高烧被认为是有害的;无论对退烧药有何担忧,都必须预防或降低体温。积极的发热经历会减少对发热的担忧。诸如热性惊厥、媒体关于发热危害的报道、未得到明确诊断、无法看普通医生以及收到关于发热管理的相互矛盾的信息等负面经历会增加担忧。家长从医生、书籍和其他家长等多个来源获取有关发热的信息。

结论

家长的发热及发热管理经历和信息来源影响了他们的知识、观念和行为。积极的经历会减少担忧、医疗服务使用,有时也会减少退烧药的使用。负面经历会增加担忧、监测以及退烧药和医疗服务的使用。

与临床实践的相关性

卫生专业人员需要更新他们的发热管理知识,确保其基于最新的科学知识。他们必须在幼儿首次发热发作之前,最好为家长提供一致、可靠的信息。

相似文献

1
Influences on parents' fever management: beliefs, experiences and information sources.对父母发烧处理方式的影响:观念、经历及信息来源
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Dec;16(12):2331-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01890.x. Epub 2007 Apr 5.
2
Parents' childhood fever management: community survey and instrument development.父母童年时期的发热管理:社区调查与工具开发
J Adv Nurs. 2008 Aug;63(4):376-88. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04721.x.
3
Management of childhood fever by parents: literature review.家长对儿童发热的处理:文献综述
J Adv Nurs. 2006 Apr;54(2):217-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03802.x.
4
Turkish parents' management of childhood fever: a cross-sectional survey using the PFMS-TR.土耳其父母对儿童发烧的处理:一项使用PFMS-TR的横断面调查。
Australas Emerg Nurs J. 2014 Feb;17(1):3-10. doi: 10.1016/j.aenj.2013.10.002. Epub 2013 Nov 21.
5
Effect of an evidence-based education programme on ED discharge advice for febrile children.一项循证教育计划对发热儿童急诊出院建议的影响。
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Sep;16(9):1687-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01716.x.
6
Parents' knowledge and choice of paracetamol dosing forms in 3- to 6-year-old children.3至6岁儿童家长对扑热息痛剂型的认知与选择
Scand J Caring Sci. 2008 Mar;22(1):93-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2006.00492.x.
7
Paediatric fever management: continuing education for clinical nurses.儿童发热管理:临床护士的继续教育
Nurse Educ Today. 2006 Jan;26(1):71-7. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2005.07.007. Epub 2005 Sep 22.
8
Descriptive survey about causes of illness given by the parents of children with cancer.关于癌症患儿家长所提及的病因的描述性调查。
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2008 Apr;12(2):134-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2007.08.003. Epub 2008 Feb 20.
9
Fever management: paediatric nurses' knowledge, attitudes and influencing factors.发热管理:儿科护士的知识、态度及影响因素
J Adv Nurs. 2005 Mar;49(5):453-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03318.x.
10
The quality of written information for parents regarding the management of a febrile convulsion: a randomized controlled trial.向家长提供的有关热性惊厥管理的书面信息质量:一项随机对照试验。
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Dec;16(12):2308-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.02019.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the Effects of the Supportive Parenting App on Infant Developmental Outcomes: Longitudinal Study.评估支持性育儿应用对婴儿发育结果的影响:纵向研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023 Feb 22;11:e43885. doi: 10.2196/43885.
2
Why parents bring their children with minor health problems to their family practitioners: An unmatched case-control study.为何家长带着患有轻微健康问题的孩子去看家庭医生:一项非匹配病例对照研究。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2021 Oct;10(10):3725-3731. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_717_21. Epub 2021 Nov 5.
3
Assessment of Saudi Parents' Beliefs and Behaviors towards Management of Child Fever in Saudi Arabia-A Cross-Sectional Study.
沙特阿拉伯儿童发热管理中父母信念和行为评估-一项横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 14;18(10):5217. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18105217.
4
Parental assessment of disease severity in febrile children under 5 years of age: a qualitative study.家长对 5 岁以下发热儿童疾病严重程度的评估:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 1;11(3):e042609. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042609.
5
An assessment of parents' knowledge and awareness regarding paracetamol use in children: a cross-sectional study from Palestine.巴勒斯坦关于家长对儿童使用扑热息痛的知识与认知的评估:一项横断面研究
BMC Public Health. 2021 Feb 18;21(1):380. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10432-5.
6
Parents' concerns and beliefs about temperature measurement in children: a qualitative study.家长对儿童体温测量的关注和信念:一项定性研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2021 Jan 7;22(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01355-y.
7
Parents' health information seeking behaviour - does the child's health status play a role?家长健康信息搜索行为——孩子的健康状况是否起作用?
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Dec 10;21(1):266. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01342-3.
8
Non-contact infrared thermometers compared with current approaches in primary care for children aged 5 years and under: a method comparison study.非接触式红外体温计与目前在儿科初级保健中用于 5 岁及以下儿童的方法比较:一项方法比较研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Oct;24(53):1-28. doi: 10.3310/hta24530.
9
Randomised controlled trial of an intervention to improve parental knowledge and management practices of fever.随机对照试验干预改善发热患儿父母知识和管理实践
BMC Pediatr. 2019 Nov 19;19(1):447. doi: 10.1186/s12887-019-1808-9.
10
Parental Approach to the Management of Childhood Fever: Differences between Health Professional and Non-Health Professional Parents.父母对儿童发热管理的方法:保健专业人员父母与非保健专业人员父母之间的差异。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Oct 20;16(20):4014. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16204014.