Campbell J L, Ramsay J, Green J
Department of General Practice and Primary Care, GKT School of Medicine, King's College, London, UK.
Qual Health Care. 2001 Jun;10(2):90-5. doi: 10.1136/qhc.10.2.90.
Patients' evaluations are an important means of measuring aspects of primary care quality such as communication and interpersonal care. This study aims to examine variations in assessments of primary care according to age, gender, socioeconomic, and ethnicity variables.
A cross sectional survey of consecutive patients attending 55 inner London practices was performed over a 2 week period using the General Practice Assessment Survey (GPAS) instrument which assesses 13 important dimensions of primary care provision. Variations in scale scores were investigated for differences relating to age, gender, socioeconomic, and ethnic status as reported by respondents.
A total of 7692 questionnaires were returned (71% response rate). Valid information on age, gender, socioeconomic status, and ethnicity was available for 4819 out of 5496 adult respondents. Approximately half the respondents reported their ethnic group as "white" and most of the remaining respondents reported belonging to "black" or South Asian groups. Significant differences existed between groups of patients defined by age or ethnicity for most of the scale scores examined. Black, South Asian, and Chinese respondents reported lower scores (representing less favourable assessments) than white respondents; older respondents reported more favourable evaluations of care than younger respondents; and less affluent groups reported lower scores than more affluent groups for two of the 13 dimensions. There was no significant difference between gender groups with respect to assessment of primary care. Age and ethnicity were independent predictors of respondents' assessments of primary care.
Differences exist between identifiable subgroups of the population in their assessments of primary health care measured using the GPAS instrument. This work adds to the literature on variation in healthcare experience and the potential for patient assessment of primary care. Further work is required to investigate these differences in more detail and to relate them to differences in the nature and process of primary care provision. Primary care providers need to ensure that services provided are appropriate for all patient groups within their communities.
患者评估是衡量初级医疗保健质量(如沟通和人际关怀等方面)的重要手段。本研究旨在根据年龄、性别、社会经济状况和种族变量,考察对初级医疗保健评估的差异。
在两周时间内,使用全科医疗评估调查(GPAS)工具,对伦敦市中心55家诊所的连续就诊患者进行了横断面调查。该工具评估了初级医疗保健服务的13个重要维度。根据受访者报告的年龄、性别、社会经济状况和种族,调查量表得分的差异。
共返回7692份问卷(回复率71%)。在5496名成年受访者中,有4819人提供了关于年龄、性别、社会经济状况和种族的有效信息。约一半的受访者将其种族群体报告为“白人”,其余大多数受访者报告属于“黑人”或南亚群体。在按年龄或种族定义的患者组之间,所检查的大多数量表得分存在显著差异。黑人、南亚人和华裔受访者的得分低于白人受访者(表示评估较差);年长受访者对医疗保健的评价比年轻受访者更积极;在13个维度中的两个维度上,较不富裕群体的得分低于较富裕群体。在初级医疗保健评估方面,不同性别群体之间没有显著差异。年龄和种族是受访者对初级医疗保健评估的独立预测因素。
使用GPAS工具衡量,人群中可识别的亚组在对初级卫生保健的评估上存在差异。这项工作增加了关于医疗保健体验差异以及患者对初级医疗保健评估潜力的文献。需要进一步开展工作,更详细地研究这些差异,并将它们与初级医疗保健服务的性质和过程差异联系起来。初级医疗保健提供者需要确保所提供的服务适合其社区内的所有患者群体。