Arraras Juan Ignacio, Giesinger Johannes, Shamieh Omar, Bahar Iqbal, Koller Michael, Bredart Anne, Costantini Anna, Greimel Eva, Sztankay Monika, Wintner Lisa M, de Sousa Marina Carreiro, Ishiki Hiroto, Kontogianni Meropi, Wolan Maja, Kikawa Yuichiro, Lanceley Anne, Gioulbasanis Ioannis, Harle Amelie, Zarandona Uxue, Kulis Dagmara, Gašpert Tihana, Kuljanic Karin
Oncology Departments, Hospital Universitario de Navarra, Navarra Institute for Health Research (IdiSNA), Pamplona, Spain.
University Hospital of Psychiatry II, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Dec 5;33(1):4. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-09000-5.
This study aims to identify a combination of clinical, demographic, and patient competence determinants of patients' communication with doctors and nurses in an international sample of cancer patients.
For our cross-sectional study, cancer patients assessed their communication with their doctors or nurses at the start of their treatment. Patients completed EORTC communication questionnaire QLQ-COMU26 to assess ten areas of communication with their doctor or nurses plus another item to assess how competent they felt when communicating with professionals. Bivariable analyses and multivariable linear regression models were performed separately for each QLQ-COMU26 area.
Included in the study were 988 patients from 15 centres in 13 countries (five cultural areas). Higher age was related to higher level of communication in eight QLQ-COMU26 areas. Males reported higher level of communication in three areas. Lower levels of studies and higher level of perceived competence when communicating with professionals were related to higher level of communication in the ten QLQ-COMU26 areas. Communication was of a higher level with nurses than with doctors in four areas. Having received previous treatment with the same doctor or group of nurses was related to higher communication levels in seven areas. Lack of comorbidity was related to higher communication levels in two areas. Various differences in determinants were found among tumour sites.
Our regression model has shown several relationships between communication and the demographic and clinical variables that may help identify patients at risk of poor communication. Future studies could focus on communication at diagnosis and in follow-up, and on areas such as assessing the particularities of communication between patient and professionals in relation to cancer type.
本研究旨在确定国际癌症患者样本中,患者与医生和护士沟通的临床、人口统计学及患者能力决定因素的组合。
在我们的横断面研究中,癌症患者在治疗开始时评估他们与医生或护士的沟通情况。患者完成欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)沟通问卷QLQ - COMU26,以评估与医生或护士沟通的十个领域,另加一项评估他们在与专业人员沟通时的胜任感。对QLQ - COMU26的每个领域分别进行双变量分析和多变量线性回归模型分析。
研究纳入了来自13个国家(五个文化区域)15个中心的988名患者。在QLQ - COMU26的八个领域中,年龄越大沟通水平越高。男性在三个领域报告的沟通水平较高。教育程度较低以及与专业人员沟通时自我感觉胜任程度较高,与QLQ - COMU26十个领域的沟通水平较高相关。在四个领域中,与护士的沟通水平高于与医生的沟通水平。之前接受过同一位医生或同一组护士的治疗,与七个领域的沟通水平较高相关。无合并症与两个领域的沟通水平较高相关。在肿瘤部位之间发现了决定因素的各种差异。
我们的回归模型显示了沟通与人口统计学和临床变量之间的几种关系,这可能有助于识别沟通不良风险的患者。未来的研究可以关注诊断和随访时的沟通,以及评估患者与专业人员之间与癌症类型相关的沟通特殊性等领域。