• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血管外科全国性疗效审计模型。

A model for national outcome audit in vascular surgery.

作者信息

Prytherch D R, Ridler B M, Beard J D, Earnshaw J J

机构信息

St. Mary's Hospital, Portsmouth, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2001 Jun;21(6):477-83. doi: 10.1053/ejvs.2001.1369.

DOI:10.1053/ejvs.2001.1369
PMID:11397019
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to model vascular surgical outcome in a national study using POSSUM scoring.

METHODS

One hundred and twenty-one British and Irish surgeons completed data questionnaires on patients undergoing arterial surgery under their care (mean 12 patients, range 1-49) in May/June 1998. A total of 1480 completed data records were available for logistic regression analysis using P-POSSUM methodology. Information collected included all POSSUM data items plus other factors thought to have a significant bearing on patient outcome: "extra items". The main outcome measures were death and major postoperative complications. The data were checked and inconsistent records were excluded. The remaining 1313 were divided into two sets for analysis. The first "training" set was used to obtain logistic regression models that were applied prospectively to the second "test" dataset.

RESULTS

using POSSUM data items alone, it was possible to predict both mortality and morbidity after vascular reconstruction using P-POSSUM analysis. The addition of the "extra items" found significant in regression analysis did not significantly improve the accuracy of prediction. It was possible to predict both mortality and morbidity derived from the preoperative physiology components of the POSSUM data items alone.

CONCLUSION

this study has shown that P-POSSUM methodology can be used to predict outcome after arterial surgery across a range of surgeons in different hospitals and could form the basis of a national outcome audit. It was also possible to obtain accurate models for both mortality and major morbidity from the POSSUM physiology scores alone.

摘要

目的

在一项全国性研究中,使用POSSUM评分法对血管外科手术结果进行建模。

方法

1998年5月/6月,121名英国和爱尔兰外科医生完成了关于其负责的接受动脉手术患者的数据问卷(平均每位医生12例患者,范围为1 - 49例)。共有1480份完整的数据记录可用于采用P-POSSUM方法进行逻辑回归分析。收集的信息包括所有POSSUM数据项以及其他被认为对患者预后有重大影响的因素:“额外项目”。主要结局指标为死亡和术后主要并发症。对数据进行检查,并排除不一致的记录。将剩余的1313份记录分为两组进行分析。第一组“训练”数据集用于获得逻辑回归模型,该模型被前瞻性地应用于第二组“测试”数据集。

结果

仅使用POSSUM数据项,通过P-POSSUM分析就有可能预测血管重建后的死亡率和发病率。在回归分析中发现显著的“额外项目”的加入并没有显著提高预测的准确性。仅使用POSSUM数据项中的术前生理成分就有可能预测死亡率和发病率。

结论

本研究表明,P-POSSUM方法可用于预测不同医院众多外科医生进行动脉手术后的结果,并可作为全国性结局审计的基础。仅从POSSUM生理评分中也有可能获得死亡率和主要发病率的准确模型。

相似文献

1
A model for national outcome audit in vascular surgery.血管外科全国性疗效审计模型。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2001 Jun;21(6):477-83. doi: 10.1053/ejvs.2001.1369.
2
Surgical audit using the POSSUM scoring tool in vascular surgery patients.血管外科患者 POSSUM 评分工具的手术审核。
Ir J Med Sci. 2009 Dec;178(4):453-6. doi: 10.1007/s11845-009-0280-1.
3
Evaluating operative risk in colorectal cancer surgery: ASA and POSSUM-based predictive models.评估结直肠癌手术的手术风险:基于美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)和朴茨茅斯评分系统(POSSUM)的预测模型
Surg Oncol. 2004 Aug-Nov;13(2-3):83-92. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2004.08.006.
4
Comparative vascular audit using the POSSUM scoring system.使用POSSUM评分系统进行的血管对比审计。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1993 May;75(3):175-7.
5
Estimation of mortality and morbidity risk in vascular surgery using POSSUM and the Portsmouth predictor equation.使用POSSUM和朴茨茅斯预测方程评估血管外科手术中的死亡率和发病率风险。
Br J Surg. 1999 Apr;86(4):471-4. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01112.x.
6
POSSUM models in open abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery.开放性腹主动脉瘤手术中的POSSUM模型
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007 Nov;34(5):499-504. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2007.04.007. Epub 2007 Jun 14.
7
POSSUM and Portsmouth POSSUM for predicting mortality. Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity.用于预测死亡率的POSSUM和朴茨茅斯POSSUM。死亡率和发病率评估的生理和手术严重程度评分。
Br J Surg. 1998 Sep;85(9):1217-20. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00840.x.
8
Portsmouth POSSUM models for abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery.朴茨茅斯腹主动脉瘤手术的POSSUM模型。
Br J Surg. 2001 Jul;88(7):958-63. doi: 10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01820.x.
9
Validation of risk assessment scoring systems for an audit of elective surgery for gastrointestinal cancer in elderly patients: an audit.老年患者胃肠道癌择期手术审计风险评估评分系统的验证:一项审计
Int J Surg. 2007 Oct;5(5):323-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2007.03.003. Epub 2007 Mar 18.
10
Comparative audit of abdominal aortic aneurysm repairs using POSSUM scores.使用POSSUM评分对腹主动脉瘤修复术进行比较性审计。
Asian J Surg. 2003 Jul;26(3):149-53. doi: 10.1016/S1015-9584(09)60374-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-term risk prediction after major lower limb amputation: 1-year results of the PERCEIVE study.主要下肢截肢后长期风险预测:PERCEIVE 研究的 1 年结果。
BJS Open. 2024 Jan 3;8(1). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad135.
2
More than 30 Years of POSSUM: Are Scoring Systems Still Relevant Today for Colorectal Surgery?POSSUM 30 多年:评分系统如今对结直肠手术仍有意义吗?
J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 28;13(1):173. doi: 10.3390/jcm13010173.
3
Effects of hospital preference for endovascular repair on postoperative mortality after elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: analysis of the Dutch Surgical Aneurysm Audit.
医院对血管内修复术的偏好对择期腹主动脉瘤修复术后死亡率的影响:荷兰手术动脉瘤审计分析。
BJS Open. 2021 May 7;5(3). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraa065.
4
Frailty In Patients Undergoing Vascular Surgery: A Narrative Review Of Current Evidence.血管外科手术患者的衰弱:当前证据的叙述性综述
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2019 Oct 17;15:1217-1232. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S217717. eCollection 2019.
5
Validation of POSSUM, P-POSSUM and the surgical risk scale in major general surgical operations in Harare: A prospective observational study.POSSUM、P-POSSUM及手术风险量表在哈拉雷大型普通外科手术中的验证:一项前瞻性观察研究
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2019 Mar 27;41:33-39. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2019.03.007. eCollection 2019 May.
6
The evaluation of risk prediction models in predicting outcomes after bariatric surgery: a prospective observational cohort pilot study.肥胖症手术后风险预测模型对预后的预测评估:一项前瞻性观察性队列试点研究。
Perioper Med (Lond). 2018 Apr 10;7:6. doi: 10.1186/s13741-018-0088-5. eCollection 2018.
7
Utility of Three Prognostic Risk Scores in Predicting Outcomes in Elderly Non-Malignant Patients after Percutaneous Gastrostomy.三种预后风险评分在预测老年非恶性经皮胃造口术后患者结局中的应用价值。
J Nutr Health Aging. 2017;21(10):1344-1348. doi: 10.1007/s12603-016-0853-4.
8
Evaluation of O-POSSUM vs ASA and APACHE II scores in patients undergoing oesophageal surgery.食管手术患者中O-POSSUM评分与ASA及APACHE II评分的评估
Rom J Anaesth Intensive Care. 2015 Apr;22(1):7-12.
9
A new risk-scoring model for predicting 30-day mortality after repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms in the era of endovascular procedures.一种用于预测血管腔内手术时代腹主动脉瘤修复术后30天死亡率的新风险评分模型。
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2016 Feb;90(2):95-100. doi: 10.4174/astr.2016.90.2.95. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
10
An evaluation of POSSUM and P-POSSUM scoring in predicting post-operative mortality in a level 1 critical care setting.在一级重症监护环境中评估POSSUM和P-POSSUM评分对预测术后死亡率的作用。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2014 Nov 18;14:104. doi: 10.1186/1471-2253-14-104. eCollection 2014.