Steinman T I, Becker B N, Frost A E, Olthoff K M, Smart F W, Suki W N, Wilkinson A H
Dialysis Unit, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Transplantation. 2001 May 15;71(9):1189-204. doi: 10.1097/00007890-200105150-00001.
Members of the Clinical Practice Committee, American Society of Transplantation, have attempted to define referral criteria for solid organ transplantation. Work done by the Clinical Practice Committee does not represent the official position of the American Society of Transplantation. Recipients for solid organ transplantation are growing in numbers, progressively outstripping the availability of organ donors. As there may be discrepancies in referral practice and, therefore, inequity may exist in terms of access to transplantation, there needs to be uniformity about who should be referred to transplant centers so the system is fair for all patients. A review of the literature that is both generic and organ specific has been conducted so referring physicians can understand the criteria that make the patient a suitable potential transplant candidate. The psychosocial milieu that needs to be addressed is part of the transplant evaluation. Early intervention and evaluation appear to play a positive role in maximizing quality of life for the transplant recipient. There is evidence, especially in nephrology, that the majority of patients with progressive failure are referred to transplant centers at a late stage of disease. Evidence-based medicine forms the basis for medical decision-making about accepting the patient as a transplant candidate. The exact criteria for each organ are detailed. These guidelines reflect consensus opinions, synthesized by the authors after extensive literature review and reflecting the experience at their major transplant centers. These guidelines can be distributed by transplant centers to referring physicians, to aid them in understanding who is potentially an acceptable candidate for transplantation. The more familiar physicians are with the exact criteria for specific organ transplantation, the more likely they are to refer patients at an appropriate stage. Individual transplant centers will make final decisions on acceptability for transplantation based on specific patient factors. It is hoped that this overview will assist insurers/payors in reimbursing transplant centers for solid organ transplantation, based on criteria for acceptability by the transplant community. The selection and management of patients with end-stage organ failure are constantly changing, and future advances may make obsolete some of the criteria mentioned in the guidelines. Most importantly, these are intended to be guidelines, not rules.
美国移植学会临床实践委员会的成员试图界定实体器官移植的转诊标准。临床实践委员会所做的工作并不代表美国移植学会的官方立场。实体器官移植受者的数量在不断增加,逐渐超过了器官捐献者的供应。由于转诊实践中可能存在差异,因此在获得移植机会方面可能存在不公平现象,所以对于应该转诊至移植中心的人群需要有统一标准,以便该系统对所有患者都是公平的。已对一般性及特定器官的文献进行了综述,以便转诊医生能够理解使患者成为合适潜在移植候选人的标准。需要处理的社会心理环境是移植评估的一部分。早期干预和评估似乎对提高移植受者的生活质量起到积极作用。有证据表明,尤其是在肾脏病学领域,大多数进行性衰竭患者在疾病晚期才被转诊至移植中心。循证医学构成了关于接受患者作为移植候选人的医疗决策基础。每个器官的确切标准都有详细说明。这些指南反映了作者在广泛文献综述后综合得出的共识意见,并反映了其主要移植中心的经验。这些指南可由移植中心分发给转诊医生,以帮助他们了解谁可能是合适的移植候选人。医生对特定器官移植的确切标准越熟悉,就越有可能在适当阶段转诊患者。各个移植中心将根据具体患者因素对移植可接受性做出最终决定。希望本概述能帮助保险公司/付款人根据移植界的可接受标准为实体器官移植的移植中心提供报销。终末期器官衰竭患者的选择和管理在不断变化,未来的进展可能会使指南中提到的一些标准过时。最重要的是,这些旨在成为指南,而非规则。