Meiller T F, Kelley J I, Jabra-Rizk M A, Depaola L G, Baqui A A, Falkler W A
Department of Oral Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, Unversity of Maryland Dental School, Balitmore, Md 21201, USA.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001 Jun;91(6):663-70. doi: 10.1067/moe.2001.113550.
The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of Listerine Antiseptic, Tartar Control Listerine Antiseptic, and Peridex mouthrinses and a 0.2% chlorhexidine digluconate solution against known pathogenic fungi.
Standardized methods were used to compare the antimicrobial efficacy of the above agents versus representative fungal species. Minimum inhibitory concentration-minimum fungicidal concentrations in macrobroth dilutions, suspension kill-time, and effectiveness against an artificial biofilm-attached population were studied.
All antimicrobials tested were effective against the fungal species under investigation at the concentration available commercially. Listerine Antiseptic showed a greater efficacy against attached artificial biofilm populations than the other antimicrobials tested.
Listerine Antiseptic, Tartar Control Listerine Antiseptic, and Peridex mouthrinses show promise as a means to control the pathogenic fungal species under investigation and may have applications to reduce oral colonization.
本研究旨在比较利斯特林抗菌漱口水、防垢利斯特林抗菌漱口水、派丽奥漱口水与0.2%葡萄糖酸氯己定溶液对已知致病真菌的疗效。
采用标准化方法比较上述制剂对代表性真菌种类的抗菌效果。研究了大管肉汤稀释法中的最低抑菌浓度-最低杀菌浓度、悬液杀菌时间以及对人工生物膜附着菌群体的有效性。
所有受试抗菌剂在市售浓度下对所研究的真菌种类均有效。利斯特林抗菌漱口水对附着的人工生物膜菌群体的疗效高于其他受试抗菌剂。
利斯特林抗菌漱口水、防垢利斯特林抗菌漱口水和派丽奥漱口水有望作为控制所研究致病真菌种类的手段,可能在减少口腔定植方面有应用价值。