Suppr超能文献

化学漱口水与草本漱口水对白色念珠菌的体外作用比较。

Comparison of the in vitro Effect of Chemical and Herbal Mouthwashes on Candida albicans.

作者信息

Talebi Somayeh, Sabokbar Azar, Riazipour Majid, Saffari Mohsen

机构信息

Department of Microbiology, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, IR Iran.

Applied Microbiology Research Center, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran ; Department of Parasitology and Mycology, School of Medicine, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran.

出版信息

Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2014 Dec 1;7(12):e12563. doi: 10.5812/jjm.12563. eCollection 2014 Dec.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

During the recent decades research has focused to find scientific evidence for the effects of herbal medicines. Researchers are interested in herbal remedies for medication and aim to substitute herbal material instead of chemical formula with limited side effects for human being.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the current study was to compare the in vitro effect of herbal and chemical mouthwashes against Candida albicans.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this research, we used a standard strain of C. albicans, PTCC 5027. The suspension was made by a fresh culture of C. albicans (24 hours) and the optical density (turbidity equating to a McFarland standard of 0.5) was read at 530 nm. The C. albicans suspension was cultured on Sabouraud dextrose agar plate. Next, two wells were filled with mouthwashes and after incubation at 30ºC for 24 hours, the inhibition zone was measured. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum fungicidal concentration (MFC) of mouthwashes were determined. Data were analyzed using the SPSS software, independent T-tests and one-sided variance analysis (ANOVA-one way).

RESULTS

Based on these findings on agar diffusion with (P = 0.764), MIC and MFC tests (P = 0.879), there were no significant differences between the antifungal effect of herbal and chemical mouthwashes.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that, chemical mouthwashes acted better than herbal mouthwashes and among different chemical mouthwashes, Oral B was most effective.

摘要

背景

在最近几十年里,研究聚焦于寻找草药医学效果的科学证据。研究人员对用于药物治疗的草药疗法感兴趣,并旨在用副作用有限的草药材料替代化学配方。

目的

本研究的目的是比较草药漱口水和化学漱口水对白色念珠菌的体外作用。

材料与方法

在本研究中,我们使用了白色念珠菌的标准菌株PTCC 5027。悬浮液由白色念珠菌的新鲜培养物(24小时)制成,并在530nm处读取光密度(浊度等同于麦氏标准0.5)。白色念珠菌悬浮液在沙氏葡萄糖琼脂平板上培养。接下来,两个孔中加入漱口水,在30℃孵育24小时后,测量抑菌圈。测定漱口水的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)和最低杀菌浓度(MFC)。数据使用SPSS软件、独立T检验和单向方差分析(单因素方差分析)进行分析。

结果

基于这些在琼脂扩散(P = 0.764)、MIC和MFC测试(P = 0.879)中的发现,草药漱口水和化学漱口水的抗真菌效果之间没有显著差异。

结论

本研究表明,化学漱口水的效果优于草药漱口水,在不同的化学漱口中,欧乐B最有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验