Freeth D, Reeves S, Goreham C, Parker P, Haynes S, Pearson S
City University, St Bartholomew School of Nursing & Midwifery, 20 Bartholomew Close, London, UK.
Nurse Educ Today. 2001 Jul;21(5):366-72. doi: 10.1054/nedt.2001.0567.
This paper describes the multi-method evaluation of an interprofessional training ward placement for medical, nursing, occupational therapy and physiotherapy students. Unique in the UK, and an extension of pioneering work in Sweden (Wahlström et al. 1997, Wahlstroöm & Sandén 1998), this interprofessional clinical placement allowed senior pre-qualifying students, under the supervision of practitioners, to plan and deliver interprofessional care for a group of orthopaedic and rheumatology patients. This responsibility enabled students to develop both their profession-specific skills in a real-world setting and the quality of their interprofessional teamwork. Student teams were supported by facilitators who led reflective sessions and acted as a resource for the students' problem-based learning. The training ward was evaluated by a multi-method approach, incorporating interviews, observations and questionnaires with students, patients and clinical staff. The evaluation findings have been grouped into a number of themes which offer an insight into the varying perspectives of training ward students, patients and staff. This paper pays particular attention to the nursing perspective of the interprofessional training ward pilot.
本文描述了针对医学、护理、职业治疗和物理治疗专业学生的跨专业培训病房实习安排的多方法评估。这种跨专业临床实习在英国独具特色,是瑞典开创性工作(瓦尔斯特伦等人,1997年;瓦尔斯特伦和桑登,1998年)的延伸,它允许即将毕业的高年级学生在从业者的监督下,为一组骨科和风湿病患者规划并提供跨专业护理。这种职责使学生能够在真实环境中培养其特定专业技能,并提升跨专业团队合作的质量。学生团队得到了协调员的支持,协调员主持反思会议,并作为学生基于问题学习的资源。通过多方法途径对培训病房进行了评估,包括对学生、患者和临床工作人员进行访谈、观察以及问卷调查。评估结果归纳为若干主题,这些主题有助于深入了解培训病房学生、患者和工作人员的不同观点。本文特别关注跨专业培训病房试点中护理人员的观点。