• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项多中心、随机、对照试验,旨在评估罗非昔布在老年晚期骨关节炎患者中的安全性、耐受性和疗效。

A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial to evaluate the safety profile, tolerability, and efficacy of rofecoxib in advanced elderly patients with osteoarthritis.

作者信息

Truitt K E, Sperling R S, Ettinger W H, Greenwald M, DeTora L, Zeng Q, Bolognese J, Ehrich E

机构信息

Merck Research Laboratories, Rahway, New Jersey 07065, USA.

出版信息

Aging (Milano). 2001 Apr;13(2):112-21. doi: 10.1007/BF03351533.

DOI:10.1007/BF03351533
PMID:11405384
Abstract

This 6-week study was conducted to test the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of rofecoxib (a selective COX-2 inhibitor) compared to nabumetone (a non-selective NSAID) and placebo in osteoarthritis (OA) patients aged 80 and older. Three hundred forty-one patients, mean age 83 years, were randomized. Allocations were made in an approximately 1:2:1:2 ratio (placebo: 12.5 mg rofecoxib: 25 mg rofecoxib: 1500 mg nabumetone). Least square mean changes from baseline in the primary efficacy endpoint, Patient Global Assessment of Disease Status, were as follows (with negative numbers indicating improvement): -14.85 mm for placebo; -25.34 mm for 12.5 mg rofecoxib; -25.40 mm for 25 mg of rofecoxib; and -25.95 mm for nabumetone (p<0.001 for all active treatments vs placebo.) Results from secondary endpoints, including the 3 WOMAC sub-scales (pain, stiffness, and disability) and the Investigator Global Assessment of Disease Status, were consistent with those for the primary endpoint. No significant between-group differences were observed in the proportions of patients who discontinued treatment due to either clinical or laboratory adverse experiences. Renal safety (edema and hypertension adverse experiences) was similar for rofecoxib and nabumetone. No gastroduodenal ulcers occurred; however, the demonstration of gastrointestinal risk with rofecoxib or nabumetone was beyond the scope of this trial. We conclude that in patients 80 years and older, rofecoxib, 12.5 mg and 25 mg once daily, demonstrated clinical efficacy for the treatment for OA as did 1500 mg of nabumetone. Rofecoxib and nabumetone were generally well tolerated in this elderly population.

摘要

这项为期6周的研究旨在测试罗非昔布(一种选择性COX-2抑制剂)与萘丁美酮(一种非选择性非甾体抗炎药)及安慰剂相比,在80岁及以上骨关节炎(OA)患者中的疗效、安全性和耐受性。341名平均年龄83岁的患者被随机分组。分配比例约为1:2:1:2(安慰剂:12.5毫克罗非昔布:25毫克罗非昔布:1500毫克萘丁美酮)。主要疗效终点“患者对疾病状况的整体评估”相对于基线的最小二乘均值变化如下(负数表示改善):安慰剂组为-14.85毫米;12.5毫克罗非昔布组为-25.34毫米;25毫克罗非昔布组为-25.40毫米;萘丁美酮组为-25.95毫米(所有活性治疗组与安慰剂组相比,p<0.001)。次要终点的结果,包括3个WOMAC子量表(疼痛、僵硬和残疾)以及研究者对疾病状况的整体评估,与主要终点的结果一致。在因临床或实验室不良事件而停药的患者比例方面,未观察到显著的组间差异。罗非昔布和萘丁美酮的肾脏安全性(水肿和高血压不良事件)相似。未发生胃十二指肠溃疡;然而,本试验未涉及罗非昔布或萘丁美酮的胃肠道风险证明。我们得出结论,在80岁及以上的患者中,每日一次服用12.5毫克和25毫克的罗非昔布与服用1500毫克的萘丁美酮一样,对OA治疗具有临床疗效。在这一老年人群中,罗非昔布和萘丁美酮总体耐受性良好。

相似文献

1
A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial to evaluate the safety profile, tolerability, and efficacy of rofecoxib in advanced elderly patients with osteoarthritis.一项多中心、随机、对照试验,旨在评估罗非昔布在老年晚期骨关节炎患者中的安全性、耐受性和疗效。
Aging (Milano). 2001 Apr;13(2):112-21. doi: 10.1007/BF03351533.
2
Efficacy and safety of rofecoxib 12.5 mg versus nabumetone 1,000 mg in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized controlled trial.罗非昔布12.5毫克与萘丁美酮1000毫克治疗膝骨关节炎患者的疗效与安全性:一项随机对照试验。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004 May;52(5):666-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52201.x.
3
A comparison of adverse renovascular experiences among osteoarthritis patients treated with rofecoxib and comparator non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents.罗非昔布与对照非选择性非甾体抗炎药治疗骨关节炎患者时不良肾血管事件的比较。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2002;18(2):82-91. doi: 10.1185/030079902125000354.
4
Treatment of patients with osteoarthritis with rofecoxib compared with nabumetone.用罗非昔布与萘丁美酮治疗骨关节炎患者的比较。
J Clin Rheumatol. 2006 Feb;12(1):17-25. doi: 10.1097/01.rhu.0000200384.79405.33.
5
Adverse upper gastrointestinal effects of rofecoxib compared with NSAIDs.与非甾体抗炎药相比,罗非昔布对上消化道的不良影响。
JAMA. 1999 Nov 24;282(20):1929-33. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.20.1929.
6
Comparison of cardiovascular thrombotic events in patients with osteoarthritis treated with rofecoxib versus nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (ibuprofen, diclofenac, and nabumetone).罗非昔布与非选择性非甾体抗炎药(布洛芬、双氯芬酸和萘丁美酮)治疗骨关节炎患者的心血管血栓形成事件比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2002 Jan 15;89(2):204-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(01)02201-9.
7
A randomized trial of the efficacy and tolerability of the COX-2 inhibitor rofecoxib vs ibuprofen in patients with osteoarthritis. Rofecoxib/Ibuprofen Comparator Study Group.一项关于COX-2抑制剂罗非昔布与布洛芬治疗骨关节炎患者的疗效及耐受性的随机试验。罗非昔布/布洛芬对比研究组。
Arch Intern Med. 2000 Jun 26;160(12):1781-7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.160.12.1781.
8
Pain management in osteoarthritis: a focus on onset of efficacy--a comparison of rofecoxib, celecoxib, acetaminophen, and nabumetone across four clinical trials.骨关节炎的疼痛管理:关注疗效的起效情况——四项临床试验中罗非昔布、塞来昔布、对乙酰氨基酚和萘丁美酮的比较
J Pain. 2004 Nov;5(9):511-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2004.09.004.
9
A double-masked comparison of Naprelan and nabumetone in osteoarthritis of the knee. Naprelan Study Group.萘普生控释片与萘丁美酮治疗膝骨关节炎的双盲对照研究。萘普生控释片研究组
Clin Ther. 1997 Jul-Aug;19(4):642-55. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(97)80090-2.
10
Gastrointestinal medications and procedures in osteoarthritis patients treated with rofecoxib compared with nonselective NSAIDs.与非选择性非甾体抗炎药相比,使用罗非昔布治疗的骨关节炎患者的胃肠道药物及治疗措施
MedGenMed. 2001 Nov 16;3(4):6.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the efficacy and safety of different nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the treatment of osteoarthritis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis based on RCT trials.评估不同非甾体抗炎药治疗骨关节炎的疗效和安全性:基于随机对照试验的系统评价和网状Meta分析。
PLoS One. 2025 May 7;20(5):e0320379. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320379. eCollection 2025.
2
Comparison of cardiorenal safety of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the treatment of arthritis: a network meta-analysis.非甾体抗炎药治疗关节炎的心脏肾脏安全性比较:一项网状荟萃分析
Ann Transl Med. 2022 Dec;10(24):1388. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-6181.
3
Safety of Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibitors in Osteoarthritis: Outcomes of a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
环氧化酶-2抑制剂在骨关节炎中的安全性:一项系统评价与Meta分析的结果
Drugs Aging. 2019 Apr;36(Suppl 1):25-44. doi: 10.1007/s40266-019-00664-x.
4
Network Meta-Analysis Comparing Relatively Selective COX-2 Inhibitors Versus Coxibs for the Prevention of NSAID-Induced Gastrointestinal Injury.比较相对选择性COX-2抑制剂与昔布类药物预防非甾体抗炎药引起的胃肠道损伤的网状Meta分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Oct;94(40):e1592. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001592.
5
Prevention of NSAID-related upper gastrointestinal toxicity: a meta-analysis of traditional NSAIDs with gastroprotection and COX-2 inhibitors.非甾体抗炎药相关上消化道毒性的预防:对具有胃保护作用的传统非甾体抗炎药与环氧化酶-2抑制剂的荟萃分析
Drug Healthc Patient Saf. 2009;1:47-71. doi: 10.2147/dhps.s4334. Epub 2009 Oct 28.
6
Using clinical trial data and linked administrative health data to reduce the risk of adverse events associated with the uptake of newly released drugs by older Australians: a model process.利用临床试验数据和关联的行政健康数据,降低澳大利亚老年人使用新发布药物相关不良事件的风险:一个模型过程。
BMC Public Health. 2011 May 21;11:361. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-361.
7
Pooled analysis of rofecoxib placebo-controlled clinical trial data: lessons for postmarket pharmaceutical safety surveillance.罗非昔布安慰剂对照临床试验数据的汇总分析:上市后药品安全性监测的经验教训
Arch Intern Med. 2009 Nov 23;169(21):1976-85. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.394.
8
Safety of the nonselective NSAID nabumetone : focus on gastrointestinal tolerability.非选择性非甾体抗炎药萘丁美酮的安全性:关注胃肠道耐受性。
Drug Saf. 2008;31(6):485-503. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200831060-00004.
9
Rofecoxib for osteoarthritis.用于骨关节炎的罗非昔布
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jan 25;2005(1):CD005115. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005115.
10
Nabumetone: therapeutic use and safety profile in the management of osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis.萘丁美酮:骨关节炎和类风湿关节炎治疗中的治疗用途及安全性概况。
Drugs. 2004;64(20):2315-43; discussion 2344-5. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200464200-00004.