Truitt K E, Sperling R S, Ettinger W H, Greenwald M, DeTora L, Zeng Q, Bolognese J, Ehrich E
Merck Research Laboratories, Rahway, New Jersey 07065, USA.
Aging (Milano). 2001 Apr;13(2):112-21. doi: 10.1007/BF03351533.
This 6-week study was conducted to test the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of rofecoxib (a selective COX-2 inhibitor) compared to nabumetone (a non-selective NSAID) and placebo in osteoarthritis (OA) patients aged 80 and older. Three hundred forty-one patients, mean age 83 years, were randomized. Allocations were made in an approximately 1:2:1:2 ratio (placebo: 12.5 mg rofecoxib: 25 mg rofecoxib: 1500 mg nabumetone). Least square mean changes from baseline in the primary efficacy endpoint, Patient Global Assessment of Disease Status, were as follows (with negative numbers indicating improvement): -14.85 mm for placebo; -25.34 mm for 12.5 mg rofecoxib; -25.40 mm for 25 mg of rofecoxib; and -25.95 mm for nabumetone (p<0.001 for all active treatments vs placebo.) Results from secondary endpoints, including the 3 WOMAC sub-scales (pain, stiffness, and disability) and the Investigator Global Assessment of Disease Status, were consistent with those for the primary endpoint. No significant between-group differences were observed in the proportions of patients who discontinued treatment due to either clinical or laboratory adverse experiences. Renal safety (edema and hypertension adverse experiences) was similar for rofecoxib and nabumetone. No gastroduodenal ulcers occurred; however, the demonstration of gastrointestinal risk with rofecoxib or nabumetone was beyond the scope of this trial. We conclude that in patients 80 years and older, rofecoxib, 12.5 mg and 25 mg once daily, demonstrated clinical efficacy for the treatment for OA as did 1500 mg of nabumetone. Rofecoxib and nabumetone were generally well tolerated in this elderly population.
这项为期6周的研究旨在测试罗非昔布(一种选择性COX-2抑制剂)与萘丁美酮(一种非选择性非甾体抗炎药)及安慰剂相比,在80岁及以上骨关节炎(OA)患者中的疗效、安全性和耐受性。341名平均年龄83岁的患者被随机分组。分配比例约为1:2:1:2(安慰剂:12.5毫克罗非昔布:25毫克罗非昔布:1500毫克萘丁美酮)。主要疗效终点“患者对疾病状况的整体评估”相对于基线的最小二乘均值变化如下(负数表示改善):安慰剂组为-14.85毫米;12.5毫克罗非昔布组为-25.34毫米;25毫克罗非昔布组为-25.40毫米;萘丁美酮组为-25.95毫米(所有活性治疗组与安慰剂组相比,p<0.001)。次要终点的结果,包括3个WOMAC子量表(疼痛、僵硬和残疾)以及研究者对疾病状况的整体评估,与主要终点的结果一致。在因临床或实验室不良事件而停药的患者比例方面,未观察到显著的组间差异。罗非昔布和萘丁美酮的肾脏安全性(水肿和高血压不良事件)相似。未发生胃十二指肠溃疡;然而,本试验未涉及罗非昔布或萘丁美酮的胃肠道风险证明。我们得出结论,在80岁及以上的患者中,每日一次服用12.5毫克和25毫克的罗非昔布与服用1500毫克的萘丁美酮一样,对OA治疗具有临床疗效。在这一老年人群中,罗非昔布和萘丁美酮总体耐受性良好。