Suppr超能文献

骨关节炎的疼痛管理:关注疗效的起效情况——四项临床试验中罗非昔布、塞来昔布、对乙酰氨基酚和萘丁美酮的比较

Pain management in osteoarthritis: a focus on onset of efficacy--a comparison of rofecoxib, celecoxib, acetaminophen, and nabumetone across four clinical trials.

作者信息

Battisti Wendy P, Katz Nathaniel P, Weaver Arthur L, Matsumoto Alan K, Kivitz Alan J, Polis Adam B, Geba Gregory P

机构信息

Merck and Co, Inc, West Point, Pennsylvania 19486, USA.

出版信息

J Pain. 2004 Nov;5(9):511-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2004.09.004.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

We compared onset of efficacy (during days 1 to 6) of 2 coxibs (rofecoxib, celecoxib) with acetaminophen and nabumetone by using a prespecified approach to data from 4 similarly designed 6-week randomized osteoarthritis trials. In 2 trials, rofecoxib (12.5 mg and 25 mg once daily) was compared with celecoxib (200 mg once daily) and acetaminophen (4000 mg daily). In the other 2 trials, rofecoxib (12.5 mg) was compared with nabumetone (1000 mg once daily) and placebo. Efficacy end points included Patient Global Response to Therapy and Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index scores. Rofecoxib (12.5- and 25-mg doses) consistently demonstrated a faster onset of osteoarthritis (OA) efficacy than the comparator drugs during the first 6 days of therapy of OA patients experiencing "flare." Acetaminophen resulted in the slowest onset of efficacy. There was a strong correlation (0.7) between efficacy response during days 1 to 6 and that averaged over 6 weeks. Rates of discontinuation as a result of lack of efficacy were significantly lower (P < .02) for each of the coxib-treated groups compared with acetaminophen and for rofecoxib 12.5 mg (P = .01) compared with nabumetone. Rofecoxib treatment, with its faster onset of OA efficacy and lower rates of related discontinuations, might provide efficacy advantages in the treatment of OA pain.

PERSPECTIVE

The efficacy of rofecoxib, celecoxib, nabumetone, and acetaminophen is established for the majority of OA patients within the first 6 days of therapy, and this predicts efficacy during the longer term. Rofecoxib provides significantly faster time to onset of efficacy and better improvement on multiple measures versus the comparators.

摘要

未标注

我们采用预先设定的方法,对来自4项设计相似的为期6周的随机骨关节炎试验的数据进行分析,比较了两种环氧化酶-2抑制剂(罗非昔布、塞来昔布)与对乙酰氨基酚和萘丁美酮在疗效起效时间(第1至6天)方面的差异。在2项试验中,将罗非昔布(每日1次,12.5毫克和25毫克)与塞来昔布(每日1次,200毫克)及对乙酰氨基酚(每日4000毫克)进行比较。在另外2项试验中,将罗非昔布(12.5毫克)与萘丁美酮(每日1次,1000毫克)及安慰剂进行比较。疗效终点包括患者对治疗的整体反应以及西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数评分。在骨关节炎(OA)患者“病情突发”的治疗的前6天,罗非昔布(12.5毫克和25毫克剂量)始终显示出比对照药物更快的OA疗效起效时间。对乙酰氨基酚的疗效起效最慢。第1至6天的疗效反应与6周平均疗效反应之间存在很强的相关性(0.7)。与对乙酰氨基酚相比,各环氧化酶-2抑制剂治疗组因疗效不佳导致的停药率显著更低(P < 0.02),与萘丁美酮相比,罗非昔布12.5毫克组的停药率也更低(P = 0.01)。罗非昔布治疗起效更快且相关停药率更低,可能在OA疼痛治疗中具有疗效优势。

观点

对于大多数OA患者,罗非昔布、塞来昔布、萘丁美酮和对乙酰氨基酚在治疗的前6天内疗效即已确立,且这可预测长期疗效。与对照药物相比,罗非昔布起效时间显著更快,在多项指标上改善更佳。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验