• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

骨关节炎的疼痛管理:关注疗效的起效情况——四项临床试验中罗非昔布、塞来昔布、对乙酰氨基酚和萘丁美酮的比较

Pain management in osteoarthritis: a focus on onset of efficacy--a comparison of rofecoxib, celecoxib, acetaminophen, and nabumetone across four clinical trials.

作者信息

Battisti Wendy P, Katz Nathaniel P, Weaver Arthur L, Matsumoto Alan K, Kivitz Alan J, Polis Adam B, Geba Gregory P

机构信息

Merck and Co, Inc, West Point, Pennsylvania 19486, USA.

出版信息

J Pain. 2004 Nov;5(9):511-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2004.09.004.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpain.2004.09.004
PMID:15556830
Abstract

UNLABELLED

We compared onset of efficacy (during days 1 to 6) of 2 coxibs (rofecoxib, celecoxib) with acetaminophen and nabumetone by using a prespecified approach to data from 4 similarly designed 6-week randomized osteoarthritis trials. In 2 trials, rofecoxib (12.5 mg and 25 mg once daily) was compared with celecoxib (200 mg once daily) and acetaminophen (4000 mg daily). In the other 2 trials, rofecoxib (12.5 mg) was compared with nabumetone (1000 mg once daily) and placebo. Efficacy end points included Patient Global Response to Therapy and Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index scores. Rofecoxib (12.5- and 25-mg doses) consistently demonstrated a faster onset of osteoarthritis (OA) efficacy than the comparator drugs during the first 6 days of therapy of OA patients experiencing "flare." Acetaminophen resulted in the slowest onset of efficacy. There was a strong correlation (0.7) between efficacy response during days 1 to 6 and that averaged over 6 weeks. Rates of discontinuation as a result of lack of efficacy were significantly lower (P < .02) for each of the coxib-treated groups compared with acetaminophen and for rofecoxib 12.5 mg (P = .01) compared with nabumetone. Rofecoxib treatment, with its faster onset of OA efficacy and lower rates of related discontinuations, might provide efficacy advantages in the treatment of OA pain.

PERSPECTIVE

The efficacy of rofecoxib, celecoxib, nabumetone, and acetaminophen is established for the majority of OA patients within the first 6 days of therapy, and this predicts efficacy during the longer term. Rofecoxib provides significantly faster time to onset of efficacy and better improvement on multiple measures versus the comparators.

摘要

未标注

我们采用预先设定的方法,对来自4项设计相似的为期6周的随机骨关节炎试验的数据进行分析,比较了两种环氧化酶-2抑制剂(罗非昔布、塞来昔布)与对乙酰氨基酚和萘丁美酮在疗效起效时间(第1至6天)方面的差异。在2项试验中,将罗非昔布(每日1次,12.5毫克和25毫克)与塞来昔布(每日1次,200毫克)及对乙酰氨基酚(每日4000毫克)进行比较。在另外2项试验中,将罗非昔布(12.5毫克)与萘丁美酮(每日1次,1000毫克)及安慰剂进行比较。疗效终点包括患者对治疗的整体反应以及西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数评分。在骨关节炎(OA)患者“病情突发”的治疗的前6天,罗非昔布(12.5毫克和25毫克剂量)始终显示出比对照药物更快的OA疗效起效时间。对乙酰氨基酚的疗效起效最慢。第1至6天的疗效反应与6周平均疗效反应之间存在很强的相关性(0.7)。与对乙酰氨基酚相比,各环氧化酶-2抑制剂治疗组因疗效不佳导致的停药率显著更低(P < 0.02),与萘丁美酮相比,罗非昔布12.5毫克组的停药率也更低(P = 0.01)。罗非昔布治疗起效更快且相关停药率更低,可能在OA疼痛治疗中具有疗效优势。

观点

对于大多数OA患者,罗非昔布、塞来昔布、萘丁美酮和对乙酰氨基酚在治疗的前6天内疗效即已确立,且这可预测长期疗效。与对照药物相比,罗非昔布起效时间显著更快,在多项指标上改善更佳。

相似文献

1
Pain management in osteoarthritis: a focus on onset of efficacy--a comparison of rofecoxib, celecoxib, acetaminophen, and nabumetone across four clinical trials.骨关节炎的疼痛管理:关注疗效的起效情况——四项临床试验中罗非昔布、塞来昔布、对乙酰氨基酚和萘丁美酮的比较
J Pain. 2004 Nov;5(9):511-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2004.09.004.
2
Efficacy of rofecoxib, celecoxib, and acetaminophen in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. A combined analysis of the VACT studies.罗非昔布、塞来昔布和对乙酰氨基酚治疗膝骨关节炎患者的疗效。VACT研究的综合分析。
J Rheumatol. 2005 Jun;32(6):1093-105.
3
Treatment of patients with osteoarthritis with rofecoxib compared with nabumetone.用罗非昔布与萘丁美酮治疗骨关节炎患者的比较。
J Clin Rheumatol. 2006 Feb;12(1):17-25. doi: 10.1097/01.rhu.0000200384.79405.33.
4
Efficacy of rofecoxib, celecoxib, and acetaminophen in osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized trial.罗非昔布、塞来昔布和对乙酰氨基酚治疗膝骨关节炎的疗效:一项随机试验。
JAMA. 2002 Jan 2;287(1):64-71. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.1.64.
5
Efficacy and safety of rofecoxib 12.5 mg versus nabumetone 1,000 mg in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized controlled trial.罗非昔布12.5毫克与萘丁美酮1000毫克治疗膝骨关节炎患者的疗效与安全性:一项随机对照试验。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004 May;52(5):666-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52201.x.
6
Efficacy and safety of rofecoxib 12.5 mg and celecoxib 200 mg in two similarly designed osteoarthritis studies.在两项设计相似的骨关节炎研究中,罗非昔布12.5毫克和塞来昔布200毫克的疗效与安全性。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2006 Jan;22(1):199-210. doi: 10.1185/030079906X80242.
7
Rofecoxib 12.5 mg, rofecoxib 25 mg, and celecoxib 200 mg in the treatment of symptomatic osteoarthritis: results of two similarly designed studies.罗非昔布12.5毫克、罗非昔布25毫克和塞来昔布200毫克治疗症状性骨关节炎:两项设计相似研究的结果。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2006 Jul;22(7):1353-67. doi: 10.1185/030079906X104876.
8
A 4-week randomized study of acetaminophen extended-release vs rofecoxib in knee osteoarthritis.对乙酰氨基酚缓释片与罗非昔布治疗膝骨关节炎的为期4周的随机研究。
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2009 Jan;17(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2008.05.018. Epub 2008 Jul 21.
9
Efficacy and safety of tramadol/acetaminophen tablets (Ultracet) as add-on therapy for osteoarthritis pain in subjects receiving a COX-2 nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.曲马多/对乙酰氨基酚片(氨酚曲马多片)作为接受COX-2非甾体抗炎药治疗的骨关节炎疼痛患者附加治疗的疗效与安全性:一项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验
J Rheumatol. 2004 Jan;31(1):150-6.
10
A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial to evaluate the safety profile, tolerability, and efficacy of rofecoxib in advanced elderly patients with osteoarthritis.一项多中心、随机、对照试验,旨在评估罗非昔布在老年晚期骨关节炎患者中的安全性、耐受性和疗效。
Aging (Milano). 2001 Apr;13(2):112-21. doi: 10.1007/BF03351533.

引用本文的文献

1
Time to first and sustained improvement in WOMAC domains among patients with osteoarthritis receiving tanezumab.接受他奈祖单抗治疗的骨关节炎患者在WOMAC各领域首次出现持续改善的时间。
Osteoarthr Cartil Open. 2022 Jul 2;4(3):100294. doi: 10.1016/j.ocarto.2022.100294. eCollection 2022 Sep.
2
An Investigation of the Molecular Mechanisms Underlying the Analgesic Effect of Jakyak-Gamcho Decoction: A Network Pharmacology Study.加味逍遥汤镇痛作用的分子机制研究:一项网络药理学研究
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2020 Dec 1;2020:6628641. doi: 10.1155/2020/6628641. eCollection 2020.
3
Preparation and Evaluation of Eudragit L100-PEG Proliponiosomes for Enhanced Oral Delivery of Celecoxib.
用于增强塞来昔布口服递送的Eudragit L100-聚乙二醇前体脂质体的制备与评价
Pharmaceutics. 2020 Jul 30;12(8):718. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics12080718.
4
Defining acute flares in knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review.膝关节骨关节炎急性发作的定义:一项系统综述。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jul 19;8(7):e019804. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019804.
5
Celecoxib for osteoarthritis.塞来昔布用于骨关节炎
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 22;5(5):CD009865. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009865.pub2.
6
Comparison between paracetamol, piroxicam, their combination, and placebo in postoperative pain management of upper limb orthopedic surgery (a randomized double blind clinical trial).对乙酰氨基酚、吡罗昔康、二者联合用药及安慰剂在上肢骨科手术术后疼痛管理中的比较(一项随机双盲临床试验)
Adv Biomed Res. 2016 Jun 20;5:114. doi: 10.4103/2277-9175.184310. eCollection 2016.
7
Characterizing Pain Flares From the Perspective of Individuals With Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis.从有症状的膝关节骨关节炎患者的角度来描述疼痛发作情况。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2015 Aug;67(8):1103-11. doi: 10.1002/acr.22545.
8
Effects of preemptive analgesia with celecoxib or acetaminophen on postoperative pain relief following lower extremity orthopedic surgery.塞来昔布或对乙酰氨基酚超前镇痛对下肢骨科手术后疼痛缓解的影响。
Adv Biomed Res. 2012;1:66. doi: 10.4103/2277-9175.100197. Epub 2012 Aug 28.
9
Efficacy of etoricoxib, celecoxib, lumiracoxib, non-selective NSAIDs, and acetaminophen in osteoarthritis: a mixed treatment comparison.依托考昔、塞来昔布、鲁米昔布、非选择性非甾体抗炎药及对乙酰氨基酚治疗骨关节炎的疗效:一项混合治疗比较
Open Rheumatol J. 2012;6:6-20. doi: 10.2174/1874312901206010006. Epub 2012 Apr 3.
10
Electrospun nanofibers in oral drug delivery.电纺纳米纤维在口服药物传递中的应用。
Pharm Res. 2010 Apr;27(4):576-88. doi: 10.1007/s11095-010-0061-6. Epub 2010 Feb 9.