Suppr超能文献

评估不同非甾体抗炎药治疗骨关节炎的疗效和安全性:基于随机对照试验的系统评价和网状Meta分析。

Assessing the efficacy and safety of different nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the treatment of osteoarthritis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis based on RCT trials.

作者信息

JiaoYi Pan, YongQi Sun, KeChun Guo, XingYu Li, ZeZhong Liu, Jin Shuai Duan, YouJia Gong, Bing Xu, XiaoFeng Wang

机构信息

Wenzhou Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Affiliated to Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Zhejiang University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Wengzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China.

The Third Clinical College of Zhejiang University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 May 7;20(5):e0320379. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320379. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Osteoarthritis (OA) as a degenerative disease, has seen a continuous rise in incidence and prevalence globally since 1990, imposing a significant disease burden. NSAIDs (Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) as symptomatic medications for OA treatment, hold an indispensable position in clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of different NSAIDs in the treatment of OA through Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis (NMA).

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on NSAIDs for OA treatment were retrieved from PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases. The search timeframe was from the inception of each database up to June 1, 2024. Outcome indicators for NMA were all conducted using a random-effects model. MetaInsight and Stata 14.0 software were used in R for calculations and plotting of NMA. Measurement data were represented by mean difference (MD), and count data by odds ratio (OR); a 95% confidence interval (CI) was also calculated for each effect size.

RESULTS

This study included 31 studies, involving 68,539 patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) and 16 interventions. NMA results showed that compared to the placebo, Tiaprofenic reduced the VAS score (MD =  -0.16, 95% CI: (-0.46 to 0.14), P >  0.05), albeit without significant difference; meanwhile, Diclofenac reduced the total WOMAC score in KOA patients (MD =  -0.41, 95% CI: -1.05 to 0.24, P >  0.05). Compared to the placebo, Etoricoxib was the best medication for improving the WOMAC pain subscale score (MD =  -0.44; 95% CI: -0.61 to -0.26); Naproxen significantly improved the WOMAC Function score in KOA patients after administration (MD = -0.43; 95% CI: -0.82 to -0.04); Diclofenac intervention significantly reduced the WOMAC Stiffness score in KOA patients (MD =  -0.40; 95% CI: -0.67 to -0.13). In terms of adverse event rates, compared to the placebo, the use of Etoricoxib significantly increased the incidence of cardiovascular adverse events (OR =  0.56, 95% CI: 0.32-0.99); Ketoprofen had fewer gastrointestinal adverse events during the medication process (OR =  0.09, 95% CI: 0.04-0.20); Licofelone had a lower rate of other adverse events during the medication process (OR =  0.80, 95% CI: 0.45-1.40, P >  0.05). Therefore, the results indicate that Etoricoxib, Tiaprofenic, Naproxen, Diclofenac, and Ketoprofen have better clinical efficacy and safety.

CONCLUSION

Compared to other NSAIDs, Etoricoxib, Tiaprofenic, Naproxen, and Diclofenac play a more effective role in improving clinical symptoms of OA; in terms of reducing the incidence of adverse events, Ketoprofen has a lower chance of adverse events. However, the possibility of these results still needs further clinical and basic research for verification.

摘要

引言

骨关节炎(OA)作为一种退行性疾病,自1990年以来在全球范围内的发病率和患病率持续上升,带来了巨大的疾病负担。非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)作为OA治疗的对症药物,在临床实践中占据不可或缺的地位。

目的

通过贝叶斯网络荟萃分析(NMA)评估不同NSAIDs治疗OA的疗效和安全性。

方法

从PubMed、Web of Science、Embase和Cochrane图书馆数据库中检索关于NSAIDs治疗OA的随机对照试验(RCTs)。检索时间范围为各数据库建库至2024年6月1日。NMA的结局指标均采用随机效应模型。在R中使用MetaInsight和Stata 14.0软件进行NMA的计算和绘图。计量资料用均数差(MD)表示,计数资料用比值比(OR)表示;同时为每个效应量计算95%置信区间(CI)。

结果

本研究纳入31项研究,涉及68539例膝骨关节炎(KOA)患者和16种干预措施。NMA结果显示,与安慰剂相比,噻洛芬酸降低了视觉模拟评分(VAS)(MD = -0.16,95%CI:(-0.46至0.14),P > 0.05),但差异无统计学意义;同时,双氯芬酸降低了KOA患者的WOMAC总分(MD = -0.41,95%CI:-1.05至0.24,P > 0.05)。与安慰剂相比,依托考昔是改善WOMAC疼痛子量表评分的最佳药物(MD = -0.44;95%CI:-0.61至-0.26);萘普生给药后显著改善了KOA患者的WOMAC功能评分(MD = -0.43;95%CI:-0.82至-0.04);双氯芬酸干预显著降低了KOA患者的WOMAC僵硬评分(MD = -0.40;95%CI:-0.67至-0.13)。在不良事件发生率方面,与安慰剂相比,使用依托考昔显著增加了心血管不良事件的发生率(OR = 0.56,95%CI:0.32 -

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0175/12057957/74b73e338320/pone.0320379.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验