Gauthier S, Ferris S
McGill Centre for Studies in Aging, Verdun, Quebec, Canada.
Int J Clin Pract Suppl. 2001 May(120):29-39.
Vascular dementia (VaD) can be defined as dementia associated with cerebrovascular disease (CVD), and accounts for a large proportion of all dementia cases. There is substantial overlap in the clinical symptomatology, pathophysiology and neurochemical mechanisms in VaD compared with Alzheimer's disease, suggesting that an effective treatment for Alzheimer's disease may also offer benefit as a symptomatic treatment in VaD. However, there are currently no explicit guidelines for conducting clinical pharmacotherapy trials in VaD patients. Two important requirements for assessing therapeutic benefits in such trials are 1) the inclusion of appropriate patients and 2) the use of appropriate outcome measures. Debate on the precise definition of VaD in relation to patient selection criteria continues, but many of the recommendations for outcome measures in Alzheimer's disease are already applicable to VaD. There is consensus that cognitive and global function measures, and assessments of abilities to perform activities of daily living (ADL) must be included as part of the optimal assessment battery in VaD trials. A measure of reduced behavioural symptoms with associated reductions in demands on caregivers would also be desirable. However, care must be taken in extrapolating Alzheimer's disease-specific evaluations to VaD, in that important differences in specific domains affected and characteristics of disease course must be taken into account. Between them, measures such as the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog; perhaps with supplemental tests of attention and other frontal lobe functions), evaluations of clinical global impression of change and a functional assessment addressing instrumental as well as basic ADL, e.g. Disability Assessment in Dementia (DAD) scale, should provide a good overall description of VaD-related deficits and sufficient appraisal of treatment effects. The Neuropsychiatric Inventory has also been shown to have good potential utility for measuring behavioural alterations in VaD. These and other assessments are reviewed to provide a balanced and realistic view of the type of treatment outcomes that can be expected in VaD pharmacotherapy trials, and to address the best ways of measuring these outcomes.
血管性痴呆(VaD)可定义为与脑血管疾病(CVD)相关的痴呆,在所有痴呆病例中占很大比例。与阿尔茨海默病相比,VaD在临床症状学、病理生理学和神经化学机制方面存在大量重叠,这表明针对阿尔茨海默病的有效治疗可能对VaD的症状治疗也有益处。然而,目前尚无针对VaD患者进行临床药物治疗试验的明确指南。在此类试验中评估治疗效果的两个重要要求是:1)纳入合适的患者;2)使用合适的结局指标。关于VaD与患者选择标准的确切定义的争论仍在继续,但许多针对阿尔茨海默病结局指标的建议已适用于VaD。人们一致认为,认知和整体功能指标以及日常生活活动(ADL)能力评估必须作为VaD试验最佳评估组合的一部分。还需要一种能够减少行为症状并相应减轻护理人员负担的指标。然而,将阿尔茨海默病特异性评估外推至VaD时必须谨慎,因为必须考虑到受影响的特定领域以及病程特征方面的重要差异。其中,诸如阿尔茨海默病评估量表认知子量表(ADAS-cog;可能还需补充注意力和其他额叶功能测试)、临床总体变化印象评估以及针对工具性和基本ADL的功能评估(如痴呆症残疾评估(DAD)量表)等指标,应能很好地全面描述与VaD相关的缺陷,并充分评估治疗效果。神经精神科问卷也已被证明在测量VaD的行为改变方面具有良好的潜在效用。本文对这些及其他评估进行了综述,以平衡、现实地看待VaD药物治疗试验中可能出现的治疗结果类型,并探讨测量这些结果的最佳方法。