Hitch G J, Towse J N, Hutton U
Department of Psychology, University of York, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom. Department of Psychology, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YF, United Kingdom.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2001 Jun;130(2):184-98. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.130.2.184.
Explanations of working memory span in children were studied in a longitudinal follow-up of J. N. Towse, G. J. Hitch, and U. Hutton (1998). Reading span and operation span were lower when within-task retention intervals were lengthened. For each task, variation in span between test waves and age cohorts was systematically related to changes in processing speed. The two spans explained substantial shared variance in both reading and arithmetic scores, with some evidence for domain specificity. Combined span scores predicted unique variance in scholastic attainment over a 1-year interval. The authors concluded that working memory span is constrained by rapid loss of active codes and is not simply a measure of capacity for resource sharing. Working memory is also implicated in scholastic development.
J. N. 托斯、G. J. 希奇和U. 赫顿(1998年)对儿童工作记忆广度的解释进行了纵向追踪研究。当任务内保持间隔延长时,阅读广度和运算广度会降低。对于每项任务,测试波次和年龄组之间广度的变化与处理速度的变化存在系统关联。这两种广度解释了阅读和算术成绩中相当大的共同方差,并有一些领域特异性的证据。综合广度分数预测了一年间隔内学业成就的独特方差。作者得出结论,工作记忆广度受到活跃代码快速丢失的限制,而不仅仅是资源共享能力的一种衡量。工作记忆也与学业发展有关。