Frisén L, Glansholm A
Invest Ophthalmol. 1975 Jul;14(7):528-36.
Visual acuity along the horizontal meridian in the peripheral field of vision was determined at a photopic level in two normal subjects. Two types of sinusoidally modulated, monochromatic test patterns of high contrast were used. One was produced directly on the retina by an interferometric technique. The other type was imaged on the retina by the dioptric apparatus of the eye; the resulting image suffered ordinary optical image degradation. The results from the interferometric acuity determinations represent maximal neural discrimination across the visual field. Acuity decreases monotonically toward the periphery, from about 45 cycles per degree in the fovea, to about 0.8 at 80 degrees of eccentricity in the temporal field. The decline is well described by a second-degree polynomial. Acuity for test patterns imaged by the optics of the eye was consistently lower than interferometric acuity. The difference increases toward the periphery. It is attributable to effects of optical aberrations. The discrepancy between optical and neural resolving power on oblique incidence needs to be taken into account whenever results obtained with external, extra-axial stimuli are to be analyzed in terms of retinal architecture.
在两名正常受试者中,于明视觉水平下测定周边视野水平子午线方向的视力。使用了两种高对比度的正弦调制单色测试图案。一种通过干涉技术直接在视网膜上产生。另一种通过眼睛的屈光装置成像在视网膜上;所产生的图像会遭受普通光学图像退化。干涉测量视力测定的结果代表了整个视野的最大神经辨别力。视力从中央凹处约每度45周向周边单调下降,在颞侧视野偏心度为80度时约为0.8。这种下降可用二次多项式很好地描述。通过眼睛光学系统成像的测试图案的视力始终低于干涉测量的视力。这种差异向周边增大。这归因于光学像差的影响。每当要根据视网膜结构分析外部、轴外刺激获得的结果时,都需要考虑斜入射时光学分辨力与神经分辨力之间的差异。