Davis R G
J Exp Psychol Hum Learn. 1975 Mar;104(2):134-42.
Two paired-associate (PA) learning studies observed the acquisition performance of 85 college students with either odors or abstract figures as stimuli and numbers as responses. In both studies visual PA acquisition was reliably superior to olfactory learning. Since the second study was designed to maximize the learning of associations to the odors and minimize the learning of associations to the figures, it appears that the sense of smell is not as well suited to the PA task as vision when essentially naive subjects are involved. In a third experiment, the familiarity of odors and figures was judged and reported as a graphic magnitude estimation response. These judged stimulus familiarities were used to select stimuli for the PA task. Subsequently, PA acquisition was facilitated by the use of highly familiar odors.
两项配对联想(PA)学习研究观察了85名大学生以气味或抽象图形为刺激、数字为反应的习得表现。在这两项研究中,视觉PA习得在可靠性上优于嗅觉学习。由于第二项研究旨在最大限度地促进对气味的联想学习,并最小化对图形的联想学习,因此,当涉及基本没有相关经验的受试者时,嗅觉似乎不如视觉适合PA任务。在第三个实验中,对气味和图形的熟悉程度进行了判断,并以图形大小估计反应的形式进行报告。这些判断出的刺激熟悉度被用于为PA任务选择刺激。随后,使用高度熟悉的气味促进了PA习得。