Stallard N, Whitehead J, Todd S, Whitehead A
Medical and Pharmaceutical Statistics Research Unit, The University of Reading, PO Box 240, Earley Gate, Reading, Berkshire, RG6 6FN, UK.
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2001 Jun;51(6):523-9. doi: 10.1046/j.0306-5251.2001.01381.x.
This paper, the second in a series of three papers concerned with the statistical aspects of interim analyses in clinical trials, is concerned with stopping rules in phase II clinical trials. Phase II trials are generally small-scale studies, and may include one or more experimental treatments with or without a control. A common feature is that the results primarily determine the course of further clinical evaluation of a treatment rather than providing definitive evidence of treatment efficacy. This means that there is more flexibility available in the design and analysis of such studies than in phase III trials. This has led to a range of different approaches being taken to the statistical design of stopping rules for such trials. This paper briefly describes and compares the different approaches. In most cases the stopping rules can be described and implemented easily without knowledge of the detailed statistical and computational methods used to obtain the rules.
本文是关于临床试验中期分析统计方面的系列三篇论文中的第二篇,关注II期临床试验的停止规则。II期试验通常是小规模研究,可能包括一种或多种有对照或无对照的实验性治疗。一个共同特点是,结果主要决定一种治疗进一步临床评估的进程,而非提供治疗疗效的确切证据。这意味着在此类研究的设计和分析中,比III期试验有更多的灵活性。这导致针对此类试验停止规则的统计设计采取了一系列不同方法。本文简要描述并比较了这些不同方法。在大多数情况下,无需了解用于得出这些规则的详细统计和计算方法,就能轻松描述和实施停止规则。