Lessios H A, Kessing B D, Pearse J S
Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Balboa, Panama.
Evolution. 2001 May;55(5):955-75. doi: 10.1554/0014-3820(2001)055[0955:psasit]2.0.co;2.
The causes of speciation in the sea are rarely obvious, because geographical barriers are not conspicuous and dispersal abilities or marine organisms, particularly those of species with planktonic larvae, are hard to determine. The phylogenetic relations of species in cosmopolitan genera can provide information on the likely mode of their formation. We reconstructed the phylogeny of the pantropical and subtropical sea urchin genus Diadema, using sequences of mitochondrial DNA from 482 individuals collected around the world, to determine the efficacy of barriers to gene flow and to ascertain the history of possible dispersal and vicariance events that led to speciation. We also compared 22 isozyme loci between all described species except D. palmeri. The mitochondrial DNA data show that the two deepest lineages are found in the Indian and West Pacific Oceans. (Indo-Pacific) Diadema setosum diverged first from all other extant Diadema, probably during the initiation of wide fluctuations in global sea levels in the Miocene. The D. setosum clade then split 3-5 million years ago into two clades, one found around the Arabian Peninsula and the other in the Indo-West Pacific. On the lineage leading to the other species of Diadema, the deepest branch is composed of D. palmeri, apparently separated when the climate of New Zealand became colder and other tropical echinoids at these islands went extinct. The next lineage to separate is composed of a currently unrecognized species of Diadema that is found at Japan and the Marshall Islands. Diadema mexicanum in the eastern Pacific separated next, whereas D. paucispinum, D. savignyi, and D. antillarum from the western and central Atlantic, and (as a separate clade) D. antillarum from the eastern Atlantic form a shallow polytomy. Apparently, Indo-Pacific populations of Diadema maintained genetic contact with Atlantic ones around the southern tip of Africa for some time after the Isthmus of Panama was complete. Diadema paucispinum contains two lineages: D. paucispinum sensu stricto is not limited to Hawaii as previously thought, but extends to Easter Island, Pitcairn, and Okinawa; A second mitochondrial clade of D. paucispinum extends from East Africa and Arabia to the Philippines and New Guinea. A more recent separation between West Indian Ocean and West Pacific populations was detected in D. setosum. Presumably, these genetic discontinuities are the result of water flow restrictions in the straits between northern Australia and Southeast Asia during Pleistocene episodes of low sea level. Diadema savignyi is characterized by high rates of gene flow from Kiribati in the central Pacific all the way to the East African Coast. In the Atlantic, there is a biogeographic barrier between the Caribbean and Brazil, possibly caused by fresh water outflow from the Amazon and the Orinoco Rivers. Diadema antillarum populations of the central Atlantic islands of Ascension and St. Helena are genetically isolated and phylogenetically derived from Brazil. Except for its genetic separation by the mid-Atlantic barrier, Diadema seems to have maintained connections through potential barriers to dispersal (including the Isthmus of Panama) more recently than did Eucidaris or Echinometra, two other genera of sea urchins in which phylogeography has been studied. Nevertheless, the mtDNA phylogeography of Diadema includes all stages expected from models of allopatric differentiation. There are anciently separated clades that now overlap in their geographic distribution, clades isolated in the periphery of the genus range that have remained in the periphery, clades that may have been isolated in the periphery but have since spread towards the center, closely related clades on either side of an existing barrier, and closely related monophyletic entities on either side of an historical barrier that have crossed the former barrier line, but have not attained genetic equilibrium. Except for D. paucispinum and D. savignyi, in which known hybridization may have lodged mtDNA from one species into the genome of the other, closely related clades are always allopatric, and only distantly related ones overlap geographically. Thus, the phylogenetic history and distribution of extant species of Diadema is by and large consistent with allopatric speciation.
海洋中物种形成的原因很少是显而易见的,因为地理屏障并不显著,而且海洋生物的扩散能力,尤其是那些具有浮游幼虫的物种的扩散能力,很难确定。世界性属中物种的系统发育关系可以提供有关其形成可能模式的信息。我们重建了泛热带和亚热带海胆冠海胆属的系统发育,使用从世界各地收集的482个个体的线粒体DNA序列,以确定基因流动障碍的有效性,并确定导致物种形成的可能扩散和隔离事件的历史。我们还比较了除帕尔默冠海胆之外的所有已描述物种之间的22个同工酶位点。线粒体DNA数据表明,两个最深的谱系存在于印度洋和西太平洋。(印度-太平洋)刺冠海胆首先与所有其他现存的冠海胆分化,可能是在中新世全球海平面开始大幅波动期间。然后,刺冠海胆分支在300万至500万年前分裂成两个分支,一个在阿拉伯半岛周围发现,另一个在印度-西太平洋。在通向冠海胆其他物种的谱系上,最深的分支由帕尔默冠海胆组成,显然是在新西兰气候变冷且这些岛屿上的其他热带海胆灭绝时分离出来的。接下来分离的谱系由一种目前未被识别的冠海胆组成,在日本和马绍尔群岛被发现。东太平洋的墨西哥冠海胆其次分离,而来自西大西洋和中大西洋的少棘冠海胆、萨氏冠海胆和刺冠海胆,以及(作为一个单独分支)东大西洋的刺冠海胆形成一个浅多歧分支。显然,在巴拿马地峡形成之后的一段时间里,印度-太平洋的冠海胆种群与非洲南端周围的大西洋种群保持着基因联系。少棘冠海胆包含两个谱系:狭义的少棘冠海胆并不像以前认为的那样仅限于夏威夷,而是延伸到复活节岛、皮特凯恩岛和冲绳;少棘冠海胆的第二个线粒体分支从东非和阿拉伯半岛延伸到菲律宾和新几内亚。在刺冠海胆中检测到西印度洋和西太平洋种群之间更近的一次分离。据推测,这些基因间断是更新世海平面较低时期澳大利亚北部和东南亚之间海峡水流限制的结果。萨氏冠海胆的特征是从中太平洋的基里巴斯一直到东非海岸都有很高的基因流动率。在大西洋,加勒比海和巴西之间存在生物地理屏障,可能是由亚马逊河和奥里诺科河的淡水流出造成的。阿森松岛和圣赫勒拿岛等中大西洋岛屿的刺冠海胆种群在基因上是隔离的,并且在系统发育上源自巴西。除了通过大西洋中部屏障实现基因分离外,冠海胆似乎比另外两个已研究过系统地理学的海胆属——真头帕海胆属和艾氏海胆属——更近地通过潜在的扩散屏障(包括巴拿马地峡)保持了联系。然而,冠海胆的线粒体DNA系统地理学包括了异地分化模型所预期的所有阶段。有古老分离且现在地理分布重叠的分支,有隔离在属范围边缘且仍留在边缘的分支,有可能曾隔离在边缘但后来向中心扩散的分支,有在现有屏障两侧密切相关的分支,以及在历史屏障两侧密切相关的单系实体,它们越过了以前的屏障线,但尚未达到基因平衡。除了少棘冠海胆和萨氏冠海胆,在这两个物种中已知的杂交可能使一个物种的线粒体DNA进入了另一个物种的基因组,密切相关的分支总是异地分布的,只有远缘相关的分支在地理上重叠。因此,现存冠海胆物种的系统发育历史和分布在很大程度上与异地物种形成一致。