Lessios H A, Kessing B D, Robertson D R, Paulay G
Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Box 2072, Balboa, Panama.
Marine Laboratory, University of Guam, Mangilao, Guam, 96923, USA.
Evolution. 1999 Jun;53(3):806-817. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1999.tb05374.x.
The pantropical sea urchin genus Eucidaris contains four currently recognized species, all of them allopatric: E. metularia in the Indo-West Pacific, E. thouarsi in the eastern Pacific, E. tribuloides in both the western and eastern Atlantic, and E. clavata at the central Atlantic islands of Ascension and St. Helena. We sequenced a 640-bp region of the cytochrome oxidase I (COI) gene of mitochondrial DNA to determine whether this division of the genus into species was confirmed by molecular markers, to ascertain their phylogenetic relations, and to reconstruct the history of possible dispersal and vicariance events that led to present-day patterns of species distribution. We found that E. metularia split first from the rest of the extant species of the genus. If COI divergence is calibrated by the emergence of the Isthmus of Panama, the estimated date of the separation of the Indo-West Pacific species is 4.7-6.4 million years ago. This date suggests that the last available route of genetic contact between the Indo-Pacific and the rest of the tropics was from west to east through the Eastern Pacific Barrier, rather than through the Tethyan Sea or around the southern tip of Africa. The second cladogenic event was the separation of eastern Pacific and Atlantic populations by the Isthmus of Panama. Eucidaris at the outer eastern Pacific islands (Galapagos, Isla del Coco, Clipperton Atoll) belong to a separate clade, so distinct from mainland E. thouarsi as to suggest that this is a different species, for which the name E. galapagensis is revived from the older taxonomic literature. Complete lack of shared alleles in three allozyme loci between island and mainland populations support their separate specific status. Eucidaris galapagensis and E. thouarsi are estimated from their COI divergence to have split at about the same time that E. thouarsi and E. tribuloides were being separated by the Isthmus of Panama. Even though currents could easily convey larvae between the eastern Pacific islands and the American mainland, the two species do not appear to have invaded each other's ranges. Conversely, the central Atlantic E. clavata at St. Helena and Ascension is genetically similar to E. tribuloides from the American and African coasts. Populations on these islands are either genetically connected to the coasts of the Atlantic or have been colonized by extant mitochondrial DNA lineages of Eucidaris within the last 200,000 years. Although it is hard to explain how larvae can cross the entire width of the Atlantic within their competent lifetimes, COI sequences of Eucidaris from the west coast of Africa are very similar to those of E. tribuloides from the Caribbean. F statistics indicate that gene flow between E. metularia from the Indian Ocean and from the western and central Pacific is restricted. Low gene flow is also evident between populations of E. clavata from Ascension and St. Helena. Rates of intraspecific exchange of genes in E. thouarsi, E. galapagensis, and E. tribuloides, on the other hand, are high. The phylogeny of Eucidaris confirms Ernst Mayr's conclusions that major barriers to the dispersal of tropical echinoids have been the wide stretch of deep water between central and eastern Pacific, the cold water off the southwest coast of Africa, and the Isthmus of Panama. It also suggests that a colonization event in the eastern Pacific has led to speciation between mainland and island populations.
泛热带海胆属Eucidaris目前包含四个已被认可的物种,它们均为异域分布:印度 - 西太平洋的E. metularia、东太平洋的E. thouarsi、西大西洋和东大西洋的E. tribuloides,以及大西洋中部阿森松岛和圣赫勒拿岛的E. clavata。我们对线粒体DNA的细胞色素氧化酶I(COI)基因的一个640碱基对区域进行了测序,以确定该属的这种物种划分是否得到分子标记的证实,确定它们的系统发育关系,并重建可能导致当今物种分布格局的扩散和隔离事件的历史。我们发现E. metularia首先从该属的其他现存物种中分化出来。如果根据巴拿马地峡的出现来校准COI分歧,那么印度 - 西太平洋物种分离的估计日期是470 - 640万年前。这个日期表明,印度 - 太平洋与热带其他地区之间最后的基因接触途径是从西向东穿过东太平洋屏障,而不是通过特提斯海或绕过非洲南端。第二次分支事件是巴拿马地峡将东太平洋和大西洋种群分隔开来。东太平洋外部岛屿(加拉帕戈斯群岛、科科斯岛、克利珀顿环礁)的Eucidaris属于一个单独的分支,与大陆的E. thouarsi差异显著,以至于表明这是一个不同的物种,其名称E. galapagensis从较早的分类文献中重新启用。岛屿和大陆种群在三个等位酶位点上完全没有共享等位基因,这支持了它们各自独立的物种地位。根据COI分歧估计,E. galapagensis和E. thouarsi的分化时间大约与E. thouarsi和E. tribuloides被巴拿马地峡分隔的时间相同。尽管洋流可以很容易地在东太平洋岛屿和美洲大陆之间输送幼虫,但这两个物种似乎并未相互侵入对方的分布范围。相反,圣赫勒拿岛和阿森松岛的大西洋中部E. clavata在基因上与来自美洲和非洲海岸的E. tribuloides相似。这些岛屿上的种群要么在基因上与大西洋海岸相连,要么在过去20万年里被Eucidaris现存的线粒体DNA谱系所殖民。尽管很难解释幼虫如何在其具有活性的生命周期内穿越整个大西洋宽度,但来自非洲西海岸的Eucidaris的COI序列与来自加勒比海的E. tribuloides的序列非常相似。F统计表明,来自印度洋以及西太平洋和中太平洋的E. metularia之间的基因流动受到限制。阿森松岛和圣赫勒拿岛的E. clavata种群之间的低基因流动也很明显。另一方面,E. thouarsi、E. galapagensis和E. tribuloides的种内基因交换率很高。Eucidaris的系统发育证实了恩斯特·迈尔的结论,即热带海胆扩散的主要障碍是中太平洋和东太平洋之间广阔的深水区域、非洲西南海岸的冷水以及巴拿马地峡。这也表明东太平洋发生的一次殖民事件导致了大陆和岛屿种群之间的物种形成。