Suppr超能文献

多非利特预防阵发性室上性心动过速症状性发作的疗效和安全性:与普罗帕酮和安慰剂的6个月双盲比较。

Efficacy and safety of dofetilide in the prevention of symptomatic episodes of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia: a 6-month double-blind comparison with propafenone and placebo.

作者信息

Tendera M, Wnuk-Wojnar A M, Kulakowski P, Malolepszy J, Kozlowski J W, Krzeminska-Pakula M, Szechinski J, Droszcz W, Kawecka-Jaszcz K, Swiatecka G, Ruzyllo W, Graff O

机构信息

3rd Department of Cardiology, Silesian Medical Academy, Katowice, Poland.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 2001 Jul;142(1):93-8. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2001.115439.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Existing drug therapies for paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT) have potentially serious adverse effects. Dofetilide, a pure class III antiarrhythmic agent, may offer an effective and safe alternative for treating PSVT. This study compared the efficacy and safety of dofetilide with that of propafenone and placebo in the prevention of PSVT.

METHODS

This multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study compared the effectiveness of oral dofetilide 500 microg given twice daily with that of propafenone 150 mg given 3 times a day and placebo in preventing the recurrence of PSVT in 122 symptomatic patients. Episodes of PSVT were documented by symptom diaries and Hertcard (Hertford Medical, Hertfordshire, UK) event recorders.

RESULTS

After 6 months of treatment, patients taking dofetilide, propafenone, and placebo had a 50%, 54%, and 6% probability, respectively, of remaining free of episodes of PSVT (P <.001 for both dofetilide and propafenone vs placebo). Both dofetilide and propafenone also decreased the frequency of episodes of PSVT; the median numbers of episodes in the dofetilide- and propafenone-treated groups were 1 and 0.5, respectively, compared with 5 in the placebo-treated group. Dofetilide was well tolerated; no proarrhythmia occurred. Three patients taking propafenone had serious treatment-related adverse effects that required drug discontinuation.

CONCLUSIONS

Dofetilide and propafenone were equally effective in preventing the recurrence of or decreasing the frequency of PSVT.

摘要

背景

现有的阵发性室上性心动过速(PSVT)药物治疗存在潜在的严重不良反应。多非利特是一种纯III类抗心律失常药物,可能为治疗PSVT提供一种有效且安全的替代方案。本研究比较了多非利特与普罗帕酮及安慰剂在预防PSVT方面的疗效和安全性。

方法

这项多中心、随机、安慰剂对照、平行组研究比较了每日两次口服500微克多非利特、每日三次口服150毫克普罗帕酮和安慰剂在122例有症状患者中预防PSVT复发的有效性。PSVT发作通过症状日记和Hertcard(英国赫特福德郡赫特福德医疗公司)事件记录仪记录。

结果

治疗6个月后,服用多非利特、普罗帕酮和安慰剂的患者无PSVT发作的概率分别为50%、54%和6%(多非利特和普罗帕酮与安慰剂相比,P均<.001)。多非利特和普罗帕酮也均降低了PSVT发作的频率;多非利特治疗组和普罗帕酮治疗组发作次数的中位数分别为1次和0.5次,而安慰剂治疗组为5次。多非利特耐受性良好;未发生心律失常。三名服用普罗帕酮的患者出现了与治疗相关的严重不良反应,需要停药。

结论

多非利特和普罗帕酮在预防PSVT复发或降低其发作频率方面同样有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验