LaBarre D D, Lowy R J
Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute, 8901 Wisconsin Ave, Bethesda, MD 20889-5603, USA.
J Virol Methods. 2001 Aug;96(2):107-26. doi: 10.1016/s0166-0934(01)00316-0.
Calculation of titer estimates and use of titer reduction assays are fundamental approaches used by virologists. Titer assays being biological assays and based on limiting dilution methods require good error control, both methodologically and analytically. The need for good statistical analysis is likely to become even greater as in clinical, manufacturing, as well as the research settings, improved analytical criteria, quality control, and assurance standards are adopted. Furthermore, increasingly, virus titer assays are based on high throughput methods, which generate continuous rather than traditional quantal data. Described here are two different weighted linear regression methods to determine TCID50 and PFU titers from CPE assays. The TCID50 analysis makes use of a generalized least squares approach using continuous colorimetric data. The plaque analysis makes use of weighted least squares forced through the origin using quantal plaque data generated by serial dilutions. Both methods are improvements in titer and error estimation compared to simpler calculation methods. These methods may have greatest value when lack of experimental material or costs of analysis precludes extensive replicate titer determinations but good estimates of titers and/or treatment differences are essential.
病毒学家常用的基本方法是滴度估计的计算和滴度降低试验的应用。滴度测定作为生物学测定方法,基于有限稀释法,在方法学和分析方面都需要良好的误差控制。随着临床、生产以及研究环境中采用了改进的分析标准、质量控制和保证标准,良好的统计分析需求可能会变得更大。此外,病毒滴度测定越来越多地基于高通量方法,该方法生成的是连续而非传统的定量数据。本文介绍了两种不同的加权线性回归方法,用于从细胞病变效应(CPE)试验中确定半数组织培养感染剂量(TCID50)和空斑形成单位(PFU)滴度。TCID50分析使用广义最小二乘法,利用连续比色数据。噬斑分析使用加权最小二乘法并强制通过原点,利用系列稀释产生的定量噬斑数据。与更简单的计算方法相比,这两种方法在滴度和误差估计方面都有改进。当缺乏实验材料或分析成本排除了广泛重复的滴度测定,但滴度和/或处理差异的良好估计至关重要时,这些方法可能具有最大价值。