Suppr超能文献

制定健康影响评估原则。

Developing principles for health impact assessment.

作者信息

Douglas M J, Conway L, Gorman D, Gavin S, Hanlon P

机构信息

Common Services Agency, Edinburgh.

出版信息

J Public Health Med. 2001 Jun;23(2):148-54. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/23.2.148.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Policies and practice in many sectors affect health. Health impact assessment (HIA) is a way to predict these health impacts, in order to recommend improvements in policies to improve health. There has been debate about appropriate methods for this work. The Scottish Executive funded the Scottish Needs Assessment Programme to conduct two pilot HIAs and from these to develop guidance on HIA.

METHODS

Case study 1 compared three possible future scenarios for developing transport in Edinburgh, based on funding levels. It used a literature review, analysis of local data and the knowledge and opinions of key informants. Impacts borne by different population groups.were compared using grids. Case study 2 assessed the health impacts of housing investment in a disadvantaged part of Edinburgh, using published literature, focus groups with community groups and interviews with professionals.

RESULTS

Disadvantaged communities bore more detrimental effects from the low transport investment scenario, in the areas of: accidents; pollution; access to amenities, jobs and social contacts; physical activity; and impacts on community networks. The housing investment had greatest impact on residents' mental health, by reducing overcrowding, noise pollution, stigma and fear of crime.

CONCLUSION

Although there is no single 'blueprint' for HIA that will be appropriate for all circumstances, key principles to inform future HIA were defined. HIA should be systematic; involve decision-makers and affected communities; take into account local factors; use evidence and methods appropriate to the impacts identified and the importance and scope of the policy; and make practical recommendations.

摘要

背景

许多部门的政策和实践都会影响健康。健康影响评估(HIA)是一种预测这些健康影响的方法,以便建议改进政策以促进健康。对于这项工作的适当方法一直存在争议。苏格兰行政院资助了苏格兰需求评估计划,以开展两项HIA试点,并据此制定HIA指南。

方法

案例研究1根据资金水平比较了爱丁堡发展交通的三种可能的未来情景。它采用了文献综述、当地数据分析以及关键信息提供者的知识和意见。使用网格比较了不同人群所承受的影响。案例研究2利用已发表的文献、与社区团体的焦点小组讨论以及对专业人员的访谈,评估了爱丁堡一个弱势地区住房投资对健康的影响。

结果

在低交通投资情景下,弱势社区在以下方面承受了更多有害影响:事故;污染;获得便利设施、工作和社交联系的机会;身体活动;以及对社区网络的影响。住房投资对居民心理健康的影响最大,它减少了过度拥挤、噪音污染、污名化和对犯罪的恐惧。

结论

虽然没有一个适用于所有情况的HIA“蓝图”,但确定了为未来HIA提供指导的关键原则。HIA应该是系统的;让决策者和受影响社区参与;考虑当地因素;使用适合所确定影响以及政策重要性和范围的证据和方法;并提出切实可行的建议。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验