• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Health impact assessment of housing improvements: incorporating research evidence.住房改善的健康影响评估:纳入研究证据
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003 Jan;57(1):11-6. doi: 10.1136/jech.57.1.11.
2
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
3
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
4
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
5
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
6
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of enzyme replacement therapy for Gaucher's disease: a systematic review.戈谢病酶替代疗法的临床疗效和成本效益:一项系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Jul;10(24):iii-iv, ix-136. doi: 10.3310/hta10240.
7
Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment.卫生技术评估中决策分析模型良好实践指南综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2004 Sep;8(36):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-158. doi: 10.3310/hta8360.
8
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.
9
The use of Open Dialogue in Trauma Informed Care services for mental health consumers and their family networks: A scoping review.创伤知情护理服务中使用开放对话模式为心理健康消费者及其家庭网络提供服务:范围综述。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Aug;31(4):681-698. doi: 10.1111/jpm.13023. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
10
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
The Minha Casa Minha Vida social housing programme and leprosy in Brazil: an analysis of the 100 Million Brazilian Cohort (2010-2015).巴西的“我的家我的生活”社会住房计划与麻风病:对1亿巴西队列(2010 - 2015年)的分析
BMC Public Health. 2025 Aug 4;25(1):2647. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22701-8.
2
COVID-19 and healthy home preferences: The case of apartment residents in Tehran.新型冠状病毒肺炎与健康家居偏好:以德黑兰公寓居民为例
J Build Eng. 2021 Mar;35:102021. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2020.102021. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
3
Hypnosis in the operating room: are anesthesiology teams interested and well-informed?手术室中的催眠:麻醉团队是否感兴趣且了解充分?
BMC Anesthesiol. 2023 Aug 24;23(1):287. doi: 10.1186/s12871-023-02229-3.
4
HUD Housing Assistance Associated With Lower Uninsurance Rates And Unmet Medical Need.HUD 住房援助与较低的未保险率和未满足的医疗需求相关。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Jun 1;36(6):1016-1023. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1152.
5
Representing Residence, Living Situation, and Living Conditions: An Evaluation of Terminologies, Standards, Guidelines, and Measures/Surveys.代表居住情况、生活状况和生活条件:术语、标准、指南及措施/调查评估
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2017 Feb 10;2016:2072-2081. eCollection 2016.
6
Health Complaints Associated with Poor Rental Housing Conditions in Arkansas: The Only State without a Landlord's Implied Warranty of Habitability.与阿肯色州糟糕的出租房屋条件相关的健康投诉:唯一一个没有房东适居性默示保证的州。
Front Public Health. 2016 Nov 23;4:263. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2016.00263. eCollection 2016.
7
A predictive model of apartment-living based on socio-economic and demographic factors with health-based approach in Iran.基于社会经济和人口因素并采用基于健康方法的伊朗公寓居住预测模型。
Glob J Health Sci. 2015 Mar 9;7(3):324-34. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v7n3p324.
8
Wellbeing impacts of city policies for reducing greenhouse gas emissions.城市减少温室气体排放政策对福祉的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 Nov 28;11(12):12312-45. doi: 10.3390/ijerph111212312.
9
Changes to indoor air quality as a result of relocating families from slums to public housing.家庭从贫民窟搬迁至公共住房后室内空气质量的变化。
Atmos Environ (1994). 2013 May 1;70:179-185. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.12.044.
10
Household disrepair and the mental health of low-income urban women.家庭失修与城市低收入女性的心理健康。
J Urban Health. 2011 Feb;88(1):142-53. doi: 10.1007/s11524-010-9529-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Housing as an environmental factor in mental health: the Johsn Hopkins longitudinal study.住房作为心理健康的一个环境因素:约翰·霍普金斯纵向研究
Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1960 Jan;50(1):55-63. doi: 10.2105/ajph.50.1.55.
2
The effects of housing quality on morbidity; preliminary findings of the Johns Hopkins longitudinal study.住房质量对发病率的影响;约翰·霍普金斯纵向研究的初步结果。
Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1958 Dec;48(12):1607-15. doi: 10.2105/ajph.48.12.1607.
3
Prospective health impact assessment: pitfalls, problems, and possible ways forward.前瞻性健康影响评估:陷阱、问题及可能的前进方向。
BMJ. 2001 Nov 17;323(7322):1177-82. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7322.1177.
4
Indoor heating, house conditions, and health.室内供暖、房屋条件与健康。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001 Dec;55(12):928-9. doi: 10.1136/jech.55.12.928.
5
What do we need for robust, quantitative health impact assessment?对于稳健的定量健康影响评估,我们需要什么?
J Public Health Med. 2001 Sep;23(3):173-8. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/23.3.173.
6
Health effects of housing improvement: systematic review of intervention studies.住房改善对健康的影响:干预研究的系统评价
BMJ. 2001 Jul 28;323(7306):187-90. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7306.187.
7
Neighbourhood renewal and health: evidence from a local case study.社区更新与健康:来自一个本地案例研究的证据
Health Place. 2001 Jun;7(2):93-103. doi: 10.1016/s1353-8292(01)00003-x.
8
Health Impact Assessment--and beyond.健康影响评估及其他。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001 Apr;55(4):219-20. doi: 10.1136/jech.55.4.219.
9
Multilevel analyses of neighbourhood socioeconomic context and health outcomes: a critical review.邻里社会经济环境与健康结果的多层次分析:一项批判性综述。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001 Feb;55(2):111-22. doi: 10.1136/jech.55.2.111.
10
Housing and health: does installing heating in their homes improve the health of children with asthma?住房与健康:在家中安装供暖设备能否改善哮喘儿童的健康状况?
Public Health. 2000 Nov;114(6):434-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.ph.1900687.

住房改善的健康影响评估:纳入研究证据

Health impact assessment of housing improvements: incorporating research evidence.

作者信息

Thomson H, Petticrew M, Douglas M

机构信息

MRC Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, Glasgow, UK.

出版信息

J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003 Jan;57(1):11-6. doi: 10.1136/jech.57.1.11.

DOI:10.1136/jech.57.1.11
PMID:12490642
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1732281/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Health impact assessment (HIA) has been widely recommended for future social policies and investment, such as housing improvement. However, concerns have been raised about the utility and predictive value of an HIA. Use of existing research data would add more weight to forecasts by an HIA. METHODS, RESULTS, and

CONCLUSIONS

A recent systematic review of housing intervention studies found a lack of research. The authors recommended that a broader evidence base would be needed to support HIA. In response to consultation with policymakers and HIA practitioners this paper presents a way in which research can be used to inform HIA. Based on the systematic review, the authors have developed a table of synthesised findings indicating the expected health effects of specific housing improvements. The authors also reviewed observational data of housing associated health risks to highlight the key impacts to consider when doing a housing HIA. The findings are presented and the authors discuss how they should be used to inform evidence based housing HIA. In addition to considering the existing research, HIA must consider the local relevance of research. Consultation with local stakeholders also needs to be incorporated to the final assessment. The lack of data and the difficulties in gathering and reviewing data mean that not all HIAs will be able to be informed by research evidence. Well conducted prospective validation of HIAs would contribute to the development of healthy housing investment by informing future housing HIA.

摘要

背景

健康影响评估(HIA)已被广泛推荐用于未来的社会政策和投资,如住房改善。然而,人们对HIA的效用和预测价值提出了担忧。使用现有研究数据将增加HIA预测的可信度。

方法、结果与结论:最近一项对住房干预研究的系统评价发现研究不足。作者建议需要更广泛的证据基础来支持HIA。为回应与政策制定者和HIA从业者的磋商,本文提出了一种利用研究为HIA提供信息的方法。基于该系统评价,作者编制了一份综合研究结果表,表明特定住房改善措施预期的健康影响。作者还审查了与住房相关的健康风险的观察数据,以突出进行住房HIA时应考虑的关键影响。本文展示了研究结果,并讨论了应如何利用这些结果为基于证据的住房HIA提供信息。除了考虑现有研究外,HIA还必须考虑研究与当地的相关性。与当地利益相关者的磋商也需要纳入最终评估。数据的缺乏以及收集和审查数据的困难意味着并非所有HIA都能获得研究证据的支持。对HIA进行良好的前瞻性验证,将通过为未来的住房HIA提供信息,促进健康住房投资的发展。